What is Sam Harris's main critique of common arguments about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy?

Harris criticizes the argument that vaccination selects for more dangerous variants, pointing out that natural immunity also selects for variants. He also highlights that the Delta variant emerged before widespread vaccination, undermining the claim that vaccines are the primary cause of new variants.

What does Sam Harris call the 'crime of the century' in relation to COVID-19?

Harris quotes Bret Weinstein's framing of the pandemic response and vaccine rollout as the 'crime of the century,' suggesting a conspiratorial belief in the suppression of ivermectin and the unethical pushing of vaccines for mercenary reasons.

What is the scientific consensus on vaccine effectiveness versus COVID-19 infection?

Sam Harris states that data clearly shows it's far better to be vaccinated and eventually catch COVID-19 than to contract it without vaccination. Natural immunity from infection provides some protection, but catching COVID-19 is generally a worse outcome than vaccination.

Why is the US vaccination rate lower than many other developed countries?

Sam Harris attributes the lower vaccination rate in the US, despite having access to life-saving vaccines early on, to misinformation and its interaction with the hyper-partisan political landscape.

What does Sam Harris mean by 'civilization as a machine for engineering and safeguarding experiences'?

Harris uses this metaphor to suggest that civilization's purpose is to create and protect certain human experiences. He observes that while we have advanced in building infrastructure and leveraging technology, the cultural and ethical software to guide these developments is still nascent.

How does Sam Harris view the rise of tribalism and identity politics?

He criticizes the modern forms of tribalism, including identity politics, for becoming increasingly irrational, erecting non-negotiable taboos, and leading to the scapegoating of others. Harris believes this trend stifles honest conversation and makes institutions intolerant in the name of tolerance.

Key Moments

Ask Me Anything #18

Sam Harris

Science & Technology3 min read29 min video

Sep 20, 2021|86,739 views|2,203|2,385

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

Sam Harris explains why he avoids discussing COVID-19 with Bret Weinstein

Key Insights

Civilization is a complex system of hardware (infrastructure) and software (culture, norms, shared stories).

Increasing failures in cooperation and widespread distrust in institutions are serious concerns.

Tribalism and identity politics are becoming dangerous, demanding irrationality and punishing dissent.

Sam Harris explains his refusal to debate Bret Weinstein on COVID-19 due to the asymmetry of spreading misinformation.

The prevalence of misinformation, especially regarding COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, is a major issue hindering public health.

The need for intellectual honesty and a shared understanding of reality is crucial for navigating current challenges.

THE DUAL NATURE OF CIVILIZATION

Sam Harris begins by reflecting on the current state of civilization, likening it to an experimental setup and a Ponzi scheme. He posits that civilization can be understood as a machine for engineering experiences, comprising both physical infrastructure (hardware) and the intangible elements of culture, ideas, norms, and shared stories (software). While humanity has made significant advancements in science and technology, the effective integration and safeguarding of experiences through culture seem to be ongoing and incomplete processes, requiring continuous refinement and explicitness, especially when cooperation falters.

SUCCESSES, FAILURES, AND THE NEED FOR MEANING

Despite the impressive degree to which many aspects of civilization function successfully, such as air travel and law enforcement, recent failures have become more noticeable against this background of taken-for-granted successes. Humanity is compelled to continue creating and evolving its culture, often driven by technological advancements and economic systems that presuppose endless growth. Amidst this progress, there's a growing urgency to find meaning and purpose, as traditional answers are proving insufficient and, in some cases, dangerous, pushing people towards various forms of tribalism.

THE DANGERS OF MODERN TRIBALISM AND INTELLECTUAL STAGNATION

Harris identifies tribalism, in both its benign and weaponized forms, as a pervasive response to the crisis of meaning. He notes that modern tribalism, regardless of its religious or secular basis, often demands irrational beliefs as a sign of in-group loyalty, erects taboos, and punishes dissent. This dynamic is visible in identity politics, where honest conversation and critical inquiry are stifled in the name of tolerance. Consequently, institutions are becoming captured, and even intelligent individuals may adopt the ethics of the crowd, leading to a dangerous suppression of thought and open dialogue on crucial issues.

THE ASYMMETRY OF MISINFORMATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH CHALLENGES

A significant portion of the discussion addresses the refusal by Sam Harris to engage in a podcast debate with Bret Weinstein on COVID-19 vaccines and Ivermectin. Harris explains this decision stems from a fundamental asymmetry: it is far easier to spread misinformation and sow doubt than it is to debunk it in real-time. He worries about the harm such encounters can inflict on public discourse, especially regarding critical public health issues. The difficulty in debunking spurious claims and the constant influx of new, unsubstantiated arguments make such conversations unproductive for public understanding.

THE IMPLICATIONS OF 'THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY'

Harris critiques the narrative promoted by Weinstein, which he characterizes as conspiratorial and alarmist, particularly the idea that COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous and that measures like Ivermectin have been suppressed for nefarious reasons. He points to Weinstein's description of vaccine promotion as 'the crime of the century.' Harris argues that scientific data overwhelmingly supports the safety and efficacy of vaccines, showing they are far superior to natural infection for building immunity. He refutes the evolutionary argument that vaccines create more dangerous variants, noting that natural immunity also drives viral evolution and that the Delta variant emerged in a largely unvaccinated population.

NAVIGATING A FRACTURED INFORMATION LANDSCAPE

The conversation highlights the fragmentation of institutions and the erosion of trust in mainstream media, academia, and government, partly due to perceived ideological capture. This leads to an exodus of talented individuals and the proliferation of alternative platforms, which, while offering more freedom, do not always provide a reliable source of truth. Harris emphasizes the necessity of navigating between extremes, avoiding both collapse due to overpopulation and the stagnation of underpopulation, while also considering the unpredictable impact of technology. Ultimately, he stresses the need for a shared understanding of reality and primary values accessible to everyone, not just isolated groups.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Supplements

●Organizations

●Drugs & Medications

●Concepts

●People Referenced

Vaccination Rates Comparison (US vs. Developed Nations)

Data extracted from this episode

Country	Rank
United States	37th
UAE	Behind US
Portugal	Behind US
Singapore	Behind US
Spain	Behind US
Denmark	Behind US
Uruguay	Behind US
Chile	Behind US
Belgium	Behind US
Ireland	Behind US
Canada	Behind US
Bahrain	Behind US
United Kingdom	Behind US
Mongolia	Behind US
Norway	Behind US
Italy	Behind US
France	Behind US
Netherlands	Behind US
Germany	Behind US
Mauritius	Behind US
Cyprus	Behind US
Cambodia	Behind US
Lithuania	Behind US
Malaysia	Behind US
Czech Republic	Behind US
Greece	Behind US

Common Questions

Sam Harris explains that he avoids debates with individuals like Bret Weinstein and Heather due to a fundamental asymmetry: it's far easier to spread misinformation than to debunk it in real-time. He fears exacerbating public confusion on important health issues, rather than winning a debate.

Topics

Health & Longevity Society & Philosophy Public Discourse Pandemic Response Identity Politics Vaccine Hesitancy Scientific Rationality Societal Breakdown

Mentioned in this video

People

Alex Jones

Mentioned alongside 9/11 truth conspiracy theorists as individuals whose platforms spread misinformation, making them comparable to Bret Weinstein and Heather in Sam Harris's view regarding podcast discussions.

Eric Topol

Doctor whose podcast with Bret Weinstein a listener requested Sam Harris discuss; Harris uses this request to explain his rationale for not engaging with Weinstein.

Sam Harris

Host of the Making Sense podcast, discussing societal trends, tribalism, and his reasoning for not wanting to debate Bret Weinstein and Heather.

Bret Weinstein

Co-host of a podcast mentioned by Corey, whose views on COVID-19 vaccines and ivermectin are critiqued by Sam Harris. Harris explains his reluctance to debate him due to perceived misinformation.

Joe Rogan

Host of a popular podcast, mentioned by Sam Harris as someone he contacted regarding the podcast featuring Bret Weinstein and Heather, suggesting Rogan might host a follow-up with qualified experts.

Locations

Micronesia

A country mentioned in the context of a fabricated paper about ivermectin's effectiveness, presented as an example of misinformation tactics.

Drugs & Medications

mRNA vaccines

The type of vaccines used for COVID-19, discussed by Sam Harris as being highly effective and a crucial tool against the pandemic, contrasting with the misinformation spread by Bret Weinstein and Heather.

Supplements

Ivermectin

A drug discussed in the context of misinformation, specifically claims of its suppressed life-saving effectiveness against COVID-19, which Sam Harris refutes.

Concepts

Myocarditis

A potential side effect of COVID-19 vaccines, mentioned by Sam Harris as a concern for teenage boys, though he notes the risk is generally lower than that of severe COVID-19.

Organizations

CDC

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, mentioned by Sam Harris as an example of an institution whose officials might be cited in misleading arguments by conspiracy theorists.

condition

COVID-19

The pandemic, which is the central topic of discussion regarding misinformation, public health concerns, vaccine efficacy, and the spread of conspiracy theories.