Key Moments

The Future We Focus Into Being | Marc Aurel Schnabel | TEDxXJTLU

TEDTED
Nonprofits & Activism6 min read21 min video
May 20, 2026|8 views
Save to Pod

Want to know something specific about what's covered?

We've already dissected every moment. Ask and we will deliver (with timestamps).

TL;DR

AI generates conventional futures, but true innovation lies in harnessing human creativity to guide technology and shape spaces based on human needs, not just simulations.

Key Insights

1

AI's initial output for a talk on the future of architecture was conventional, reflecting current reality rather than a vision for new possibilities.

2

China's demographic shift towards an aging population with fewer young people presents a crucial challenge for future architecture and space utilization.

3

Virtual reality's potential is more in how the virtual can influence and enrich our real lives, rather than solely simulating existing reality (e.g., digital twins).

4

The speaker coined the term 'Internet of Spaces' to emphasize spatial thinking and human interaction over the purely technical 'Internet of Things' and 'smart cities'.

5

By using eye-tracking, architects can understand how people use and perceive environments, moving beyond traditional building regulations to focus on visual harmony and aesthetic integration.

6

Human creativity allows for improvisation and adaptation in built environments, such as rerouting pipes through windows or under floors when initial plans falter, leading to individualized and often aesthetically pleasing solutions.

AI reflects current reality rather than future vision

The talk begins by questioning the common association of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with futuristic visions. When asked to generate content for a talk about the future, AI produced conventional imagery of cities with roads, buildings, and distinct groups of men and women. This suggests AI, in its current form, tends to reflect and extrapolate from existing realities rather than offering truly novel or visionary concepts. The speaker highlights that while AI is connected to the future, its output often mirrors the present, prompting a deeper consideration of how we frame our questions and expectations for these technologies. This is particularly relevant in contexts like China, where rapid development over the past two decades has transformed cities, and a new phase is emerging.

Demographic shifts challenge future urban planning

A significant challenge for the future, especially in countries like China, is the changing demographic landscape. The population is peaking and aging, leading to an increase in the elderly and a decrease in the younger workforce. This demographic shift has profound implications for architecture and the utilization of built spaces. The question arises: "If, in the future, we don't have enough people to fill these spaces and live in them, what becomes of our architecture and urban environments?" AI can be a tool to think about these problems, but it's not the ultimate solution. The real human contribution lies in how we use these computational tools to think differently about the problems we face.

Moving beyond reality simulation to virtual influence

The speaker differentiates between simulating reality in virtual contexts, such as 'smart cities' and 'digital twins,' and leveraging the virtual to actively influence and enrich our real lives. While simulating existing environments digitally has its uses, the speaker's primary interest lies in how virtual experiences can inform and enhance our physical reality. This leads to the concept of 'real AI' – our human intelligence – working in tandem with 'virtual AI' – computational intelligence. An example given is a building designed conceptually as a 'cloud,' where the virtual idea of a cloud informs its physical manifestation and architectural form, demonstrating how a virtual concept can translate into tangible reality.

The 'Internet of Spaces' prioritizes human interaction

Traditional technological frameworks like the 'Internet of Things' and 'smart cities' are often too technical and focus on the technology itself. The speaker proposes a shift towards the 'Internet of Spaces,' which emphasizes spatial thinking and the human experience within these environments. In this paradigm, technology is present but secondary to how humans interact within and interpret spaces. This approach brings the human element to the forefront, elevating the discourse from mere technical simulation to a higher level of understanding and participation within our surroundings. The market analogy, where simple rules create vibrant, complex environments, illustrates how human-centric design can generate meaningful spaces.

Integrating physical and virtual realities for enhanced understanding

Collaborative projects with students demonstrate the power of combining physical and virtual realities. In one example, a VR experience of reaching for a high object is grounded by the physical act of using a chair to understand its scale and context within a real-world setting. This blend allows for richer discussion and interaction. While digital twins can simulate environmental behaviors like flooding or earthquakes, they often fail to capture human emotional responses. To address this, eye-tracking technology is employed to understand where people look and how they perceive an environment, offering insights into building regulations and aesthetic integration that go beyond traditional metrics. This leads to the innovative idea of using the eyes not just to see, but to generate form and interact with architectural designs.

AI as a tool for complex design and fabrication

The evolution of architectural representation from complex 2D plans to 3D visualizations, aided by technologies from industries like aviation, has made designs more understandable. Modern architecture often features highly complex facades with unique panel shapes. While desirable, producing these requires not just designing the building but also the machines to fabricate its components. AI plays a crucial role here, automating the generation of complex joints and components. The next step involves AI generating code that produces forms, allowing humans to focus on the 'design intent' and explore possibilities. This automation of complexity enables the creation of highly individualized and intricate architectural elements.

Human ingenuity creates adaptable and beautiful spaces

Despite the precision of computer-aided design, human creativity and adaptability often lead to elegant solutions when plans encounter real-world constraints. Examples include rerouting pipes through windows or placing them beneath floors when original holes are missed, creating individualized and often aesthetically pleasing outcomes. This contrasts with purely computer-generated environments that may appear perfect but lack the organic adaptability of human intervention. The speaker also explores virtual environments that are not mere replicas of reality but exist as unique digital expressions, where actors outside the VR can interact with users inside, blurring the lines between performer and audience, and making the audience the active participant.

Creating responsive and living environments

The concept of spaces that respond to human emotion and presence is explored through large-scale installations that deform, transform, and interact with individuals. This creates a dynamic and personal experience where the environment seems to communicate and react. Furthermore, the preservation of heritage sites, like the city of Kashgar, can be reimagined not as static archives but as 'living objects' within interactive digital environments. Using photogrammetry and drone technology, these spaces are rebuilt to be modifiable and customizable by users, allowing for a dynamic engagement with cultural heritage. This approach moves beyond passive observation to active participation, making environments feel alive and adaptable, and ultimately addressing critical issues like climate change through thoughtful spatial design.

The Future We Focus Into Being: Key Principles

Practical takeaways from this episode

Do This

Embrace AI as a tool to augment human thinking and creativity, not replace it.
Think spatially about the 'internet of spaces' to prioritize human interaction.
Design environments that are 'living' and interactive, rather than static archives.
Use technology to translate virtual ideas into tangible, enriching realities.
Integrate senses beyond sight to create deeper, more active experiences.
Consider the role of architecture and the built environment in addressing climate change.

Avoid This

Rely solely on AI to generate traditional or conventional future visions.
Focus only on the technical aspects of smart cities without considering human experience.
Treat virtual simulations as mere replicas of reality; explore their unique potential.
Design spaces that are merely functional, without generating genuine meaning or interaction.
View archived or heritage environments as static; aim to make them living entities.
Neglect the impact of climate change; use architecture to foster more sustainable environments.

Common Questions

AI is used as a tool to analyze data, generate design options, automate complex processes in construction, and even create intricate building components. It helps architects think differently and explore new possibilities.

Topics

Mentioned in this video

More from TEDx Talks

View all 70 summaries

Ask anything from this episode.

Save it, chat with it, and connect it to Claude or ChatGPT. Get cited answers from the actual content — and build your own knowledge base of every podcast and video you care about.

Get Started Free