Key Moments
Bringing Extinct Species Back to Life | Dr. Beth Shapiro
Key Moments
De-extinction efforts, like recreating direwolves and mammoths, are developing crucial genetic tools that can also be used to save endangered species from extinction.
Key Insights
Bringing back extinct species like direwolves involves engineering around 20 genetic edits into a grey wolf genome, based on ancient DNA analysis.
Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA comprise 2-5% of modern human genomes, offering insights into human evolution and disease resistance.
The success of de-extinction projects is technically feasible due to advancements in ancient DNA recovery, with mammoth DNA being the oldest recovered at 1-2 million years old.
Colossal Biosciences is developing synthetic biology tools, applicable to de-extinction and conservation, including for birds and marsupials, and has successfully cloned direwolves.
Gene drives, a synthetic biology tool, offer potential for controlling invasive species like cheatgrass or disease-carrying mosquitoes, with built-in safety mechanisms.
The de-extinction of the black-footed ferret population was boosted by cloning a 40-year-old preserved individual to increase genetic diversity and by developing plague resistance through genetic engineering.
Defining species and human-like lineages
The concept of a 'species' is a human construct, with multiple species concepts (biological, genetic, geographic) used for classification. DNA sequencing has revolutionized our understanding of evolutionary relationships. For instance, Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) interbred, resulting in 2-5% Neanderthal DNA in modern human populations. This genetic legacy is not uniform across individuals, with different Neanderthal DNA segments present in different people. Collectively, the surviving Neanderthal DNA in humans today represents over 90% of the Neanderthal genome, suggesting most of it was not maladaptive. This comparison between humans and Neanderthals, with a divergence of 300,000-500,000 years, provides a shorter evolutionary timeline than comparing humans to chimpanzees (3-5 million years), helping scientists pinpoint unique human genetic traits. Similarly, brown and polar bears diverged about half a million years ago and can still interbreed, though hybrid survival often favors one lineage due to specific adaptations, such as a polar bear's hunting success being hindered by brown bear fur coloration.
The science and feasibility of de-extinction
Bringing extinct species back to life, or de-extinction, relies heavily on advancements in ancient DNA (aDNA) recovery and genetic engineering. The oldest aDNA recovered to date is from a mammoth bone, estimated to be 1-2 million years old. This is in stark contrast to dinosaurs, which went extinct over 66 million years ago, far beyond the point where DNA is recoverable due to fossilization and degradation processes like UV radiation, freeze-thaw cycles, and microbial decay. Environments like the cold Arctic, where organisms are rapidly buried, offer better preservation conditions for DNA compared to hot, wet climates like Mauritius, the dodo's habitat. The process involves engineering specific genetic changes into a closely related living species' genome. For example, recreating the direwolf involved sequencing fossil direwolf genomes to identify genetic traits for size, robustness, and coat color, and then engineering these into a grey wolf genome. The goal isn't to create an exact replica of an individual but an animal capable of fulfilling the ecological niche of the extinct species, adapted to present-day conditions. This involves meticulous gene selection to ensure safety and health, as seen with the direwolf project where potential risks like oculocutaneous albinism were avoided by using safe, existing genetic variants from domestic dogs for coat color engineering.
Ecological restoration and species conservation
De-extinction efforts are intrinsically linked to wildlife conservation and ecosystem restoration. The tools developed for de-extinction, such as genome editing and synthetic biology, are directly applicable to helping living species avoid extinction. For instance, by exciting the public with the idea of mammoths and dodos, greater investment and enthusiasm are generated for conservation technologies. The reintroduction of keystone species can have cascading positive effects on ecosystems. The restoration of grey wolves in Yellowstone National Park, for example, led to changes in elk behavior, increased vegetation growth along rivers, and altered river flow. Colossal Biosciences is working on projects like the dodo and the Tasmanian tiger (thylacine) because their absence has destabilized their respective ecosystems. The thylacine, as a top predator in Tasmania, is crucial for managing populations and potentially mitigating issues like the spread of transmissible cancers in Tasmanian devils. Similarly, an endangered bird, the northern quoll, can be engineered to be resistant to toxic cane toads, a major threat to its survival in Australia. This highlights how synthetic biology can provide targeted solutions for conservation challenges.
Technological advancements and ethical considerations
The progress in genetic technologies, including cloning and gene editing (like CRISPR), has opened up possibilities previously confined to science fiction. The development of artificial wombs is being explored to support the birthing of multiple mammoths simultaneously, reducing reliance on surrogate elephant mothers and potentially leading to applications in human medicine for premature infants or complicated pregnancies. While these technologies offer immense potential, they also raise significant ethical questions. Concerns about 'playing God,' unintended consequences, and equitable access are paramount. The scientific community is increasingly emphasizing transparency and public engagement through initiatives like advisory panels composed of local stakeholders and conservationists, and detailed 'care reports' outlining potential ecosystem impacts. This collaborative approach aims to build trust and ensure that decisions about de-extinction and conservation are well-informed and ethically sound, acknowledging that 'doing nothing' is also a decision with consequences for biodiversity.
Human genetic selection and future implications
The conversation extends to human genetic engineering and selection. Technologies like in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preimplantation genetic testing already allow for the selection of embryos based on health and, increasingly, on traits like potential IQ or height. This practice, while often framed as disease prevention, raises concerns about eugenics and exacerbating social inequalities due to high costs. Dr. Shapiro highlights that genetic selection in humans has historical parallels in mate choice and has even occurred through large-scale population movements, such as the introduction of genes for taller stature in Northern European populations. The discomfort surrounding human genetic selection stems from the fear of limiting future generations' freedom and the potential for unforeseen consequences. As these technologies advance, society faces the challenge of navigating their ethical implications, ensuring they are used responsibly and equitably to improve human health and well-being without replicating past mistakes or creating new divides.
The role of public perception and education
Public perception significantly influences the acceptance and implementation of advanced biotechnologies. The allure of 'Jurassic Park' has created a public imagination often focused on bringing back dinosaurs, which is scientifically unfeasible due to the lack of DNA. This fascination, however, can be channeled into public enthusiasm for more achievable goals like de-extinction of mammoths or direwolves. Dr. Shapiro emphasizes that public education is critical for demystifying these complex scientific endeavors and fostering trust. By engaging with the public through podcasts, documentaries, and direct communication, scientists can humanize their work, showcase its potential benefits, and address fears and misconceptions. The positive reception of the direwolves, for example, introduced many people to concepts like de-extinction and synthetic biology for the first time, sparking curiosity and agency about the future. This inclusive approach is vital for navigating the ethical landscapes of genetic engineering and conservation.
Addressing conservation challenges with diverse tools
The scientific community is employing a multi-faceted approach to conservation, integrating de-extinction with existing preservation strategies. The black-footed ferret serves as a compelling case study. Initially pushed to the brink of extinction due to habitat loss and disease (plague), efforts to revive the species have involved captive breeding programs, including the use of cloning from preserved tissues to reintroduce genetic diversity. Furthermore, scientists are exploring synthetic biology to engineer plague resistance in these ferrets, addressing a key threat to their wild populations. This dual approach—using cloning for genetic rescue and genetic engineering for disease resistance—exemplifies how advanced tools can tackle complex conservation issues. Similarly, projects involving the dodo, woolly mammoth, and even less publicized species like the Mauritian pink pigeon and the Northern Quoll demonstrate a commitment to applying genetic technologies across diverse taxa, often inspired by the public's interest in charismatic megafauna to garner support for broader conservation goals.
Mentioned in This Episode
●Companies
●Organizations
●Books
●Drugs & Medications
●Concepts
●People Referenced
Common Questions
The primary motivation is to use the advanced tools of genomics and synthetic biology to both de-extinct species and prevent living species from becoming extinct. Exciting people with creatures like mammoths and dodos generates engagement and investment in developing technology that benefits broader conservation efforts.
Topics
Mentioned in this video
The company where Dr. Beth Shapiro is Chief Scientific Officer, focused on de-extincting species like the woolly mammoth, dodo bird, and direwolf, and using genomics for broader species preservation.
A school where students learn from AI tutors on iPads and also engage in practical skills like farming and starting businesses, aiming to revolutionize education.
A film that popularized the idea of de-extinction, though its scientific methods (using frog DNA for dinosaurs) are inaccurate compared to modern approaches.
A band used as an analogy to explain that individuals, like scientists, are driven by their specific passions and cannot be easily redirected to other goals, even if noble.
An example of an ecosystem where island foxes adapted to living in small populations with low genetic diversity due to limited predators.
A place in Panama where Dr. Shapiro lived and studied parasettoid wasps, transitioning her focus from journalism to ecology.
Dr. Shapiro's undergraduate alma mater, where she initially studied broadcast journalism before switching to science.
A collaborative conservation effort involving US Fish and Wildlife, San Diego Frozen Zoo, and Revive & Restore to save the black-footed ferret from extinction.
More from Andrew Huberman
View all 418 summaries
38 minTools to Improve Your Focus & Concentration | Huberman Lab Essentials
123 minWhat Humans, Animals and Plants Tell Us About Consciousness | Michael Pollan
36 minEssentials: Optimal Protocols to Build Strength & Grow Muscles | Dr. Andy Galpin
148 minBest Tools for Gut Health & Weight Loss | Dr. Chris Thompson
Ask anything from this episode.
Save it, chat with it, and connect it to Claude or ChatGPT. Get cited answers from the actual content — and build your own knowledge base of every podcast and video you care about.
Get Started Free