How is AI used in PB’s songwriting process?

PB treats AI as a starting point for ideas or questions rather than a substitute for the musical craft. He uses AI to generate concepts or quick answers to writerly questions, and then collaborates with human musicians to develop the chords and melody. (Timestamp: 226)

Can AI truly capture the human soul in music?

PB argues that AI cannot quantify the human soul and that real emotion comes from lived experiences—heartbreak, love, and other human experiences. He believes AI may approximate patterns but won’t replicate authentic emotional depth. (Timestamp: 399)

What is Suno and how was it used in the demo?

Suno is an AI tool used as a 'digital version' of PB to generate a hook and post-hook after PB provides a concept. The live demo compares the AI-generated version to the human version to see which resonates more with the audience. (Timestamp: 1109)

What guardrails does PB want for AI in creative work?

PB calls for protections to prevent AI from ripping off existing creators' sounds and to ensure there’s a way to detect artificial origins. He envisions safeguards that can identify artificial content and defend the rights of original artists. (Timestamp: 555)

Will live concerts adapt to new tech and remain accessible?

PB expects new concert models that aren’t solely based on ticket sales, including brand-supported experiences that can be free for fans while still compensating artists. He suggests experiments with brand-funded, free concerts to broaden access. (Timestamp: 932)

A Songwriting Battle with My AI Clone | Jason "Poo Bear" Boyd | TED

TEDx Talks

People & Blogs4 min read34 min video

Mar 8, 2026|8,733 views|185|33

TEDTalk TEDTalks TED Talk TED Talks TED music performance ai

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

AI is a tool; human soul remains essential to music, not a replacement.

Key Insights

Great songs balance simplicity and memorability with emotional depth that resonates across listeners.

Technology evolves to save time; early adopters like PB recognize tools (Pro Tools, Auto-Tune) can accelerate creativity.

AI should augment the creative process—useful for concepts, questions, and starting points, not as a complete substitute for musicianship.

The human soul—emotions, heartbreak, and lived experience—creates a dimension AI cannot fully replicate.

Regulation and copyright guardrails are needed to protect original creators and address AI-generated content.

The live-music model may shift toward accessible experiences (e.g., brand-funded free concerts) to keep audiences engaged.

THE ESSENCE OF A GREAT SONG

Jason “Poo Bear” Boyd articulates a definition of a great song as a frequency that is both simple and effective—easy enough for a child to remember and sing along, yet potent enough to trigger meaningful neural responses. This framing emphasizes a balance between accessibility and depth, rooted in years of trial and refinement. The idea is not just catchy hooks but a resonance that endures, where clarity of message and melodic memory converge with emotional punch. Throughout the talk, he hints that enduring songs emerge from a combination of craft, life experience, and a certain alchemy that goes beyond technical prowess. This section lays the groundwork for understanding how technology, including AI, should serve this core creative objective rather than replace it.

TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL: FROM REEL-TO-REEL TO PRO TOOLS

PB reflects on his career’s technological arc—from reel-to-reel tape and ADATs to Pro Tools and modern plugins. He notes that time is the most valuable resource for creators, and digital tools exist to save it. Though he acknowledges initial skepticism toward new tech, he emphasizes that tools like Auto-Tune and later AI have become essential for efficiency and broad accessibility. This section traces how technology reshaped workflows, highlighting the tension between embracing efficiency and preserving the human touch that makes music feel alive.

AI IN CREATIVE WORKFLOWS: TOOL OR THREAT?

PB distinguishes between the music-making process and conceptual exploration. While he hasn’t integrated AI into composing chords or live musical performance, he uses AI as a source of ideas, questions, and quick research—serving as a starting point rather than a replacement for human musicians. He raises practical concerns about copyright and originality, noting that AI can help avoid re-creating existing works but also warns of the risk of homogenization if tools are relied upon too heavily. The takeaway is practical: lean on AI for brainstorming and information, but rely on human artistry for musical substance.

THE HUMAN SOUL: EMOTION BEYOND ALGORITHMS

A central thread is the unsung power of the human soul in music. PB argues that AI, fundamentally a math-based system, cannot fully quantify or reproduce heartbreak, love, and the lived experiences that infuse songs with true emotional weight. He concedes that AI may approximate patterns but will likely fall short of delivering the authentic, emotionally charged connection that originates from human vulnerability. This section reinforces the argument that technology should complement, not erase, the unique emotional imprint that only people can create.

COPYRIGHT, GUARDRAILS, AND THE FUTURE OF COPYRIGHT

The conversation shifts to governance: how to protect creative origins as AI-generated content proliferates. PB calls for guardrails that detect artificial origins and safeguard the artists whose sounds and signatures have taken years to develop. He envisions mechanisms to attribute influence and ensure fair use, while also acknowledging the ongoing legal evolution around AI in music. This section highlights the need for robust copyright frameworks that balance innovation with the rights and livelihoods of original creators.

THE CIRCLE OF TECHNOLOGY: ANALOG, DIGITAL, AND BACK AGAIN

PB draws a parallel with the 1980s shift to digital synths and drum machines, noting that initial excitement can overshadow the warmth of authentic instrumentation. He predicts a cyclical pattern: technological novelty peaks, then a recalibration toward human touch and tangible instrumentation. The discussion emphasizes that while AI and digital tools will persist, many artists will eventually re-embrace real, live performance and analog sensibilities to recapture warmth, spontaneity, and the ‘soul factor’ that AI cannot fully replicate.

REIMAGINING LIVE MUSIC IN A COSTLY WORLD

Addressing the economic realities of live performance, PB discusses how live music remains highly valued but financially out of reach for many fans. He envisions innovative models where brands sponsor or underwrite experiences, enabling free or low-cost concerts and alternative revenue streams beyond ticket sales and merch. This section explores the social and cultural importance of real-world gatherings, arguing that the energy of shared performances is a powerful driver of connection that digital experiences cannot fully replace.

POO BEAR VS SUNO: A LIVE SONGWRITING DEMONSTRATION

The talk culminates in an experimental demonstration where Poo Bear competes with Suno, an AI clone, in real-time songwriting. PB selects a three-chord progression and a concept, then develops a hook and post-hook, subsequently prompting Suno to generate a competing hook. Despite some technical hiccups, the exercise reveals both the speed and the current limits of AI. The human version—PB’s hook—emerges as more emotionally coherent and resonant, underscoring the thesis that human soul remains indispensable. The demo also conveys a pragmatic message: AI can assist, but it cannot replace the nuanced artistry of a real musician.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Tools & Products

●People Referenced

AI-assisted Songwriting: Practical cheat sheet

Practical takeaways from this episode

Do This

Use AI as a starting point for concepts or questions, not as a replacement for genuine musical intuition.

Prompt AI to generate a hook or post-hook after you draft a core idea to compare perspectives.

Ensure you check for copyright overlap when running AI-generated ideas through your own material.

Protect and honor the unique human soul aspect in music; don't rely solely on algorithmic outputs.

Avoid This

Don’t rely exclusively on AI for chord progressions or core composition without human input.

Don’t assume AI-created content is free from copyright concerns or that it can fully replace an artist’s voice.

Common Questions

PB describes a great song as a frequency that is simple enough to be remembered but powerful enough to engage the listener's brain. He emphasizes years of trial and error and balancing accessibility with emotional resonance. (Timestamp: 105)