Key Moments
We’ve Been Looking for Aliens for 70 Years. We've Been Doing It Wrong All Along
PBS Space TimeWant to know something specific about what's covered?
We've already dissected every moment. Ask and we will deliver (with timestamps).
Key Moments
We've been searching for alien radio signals for 65 years with no success, suggesting we need to look for highly-targeted, broadband optical or infrared signals instead of narrow-band radio.
Key Insights
SETI searches have historically focused on narrow-band radio signals from civilizations like ours, assuming they'd use frequencies like the 'water hole' (230-300 MHz) due to propagation and energy efficiency.
If technological civilizations last only 1,000 years, 99% of detectable civilizations would be more advanced than humanity, making our 100-year window of noticeability extremely small.
Modern laser technology allows for highly collimated visible and infrared beams, enabling transmissions focused on a single planet rather than an entire orbit, a concept unattainable with 1960s radio technology.
The Habitable Worlds Observatory is expected to provide the first images of Earth-like exoplanets within hundreds of light-years in the 2030s, enabling targeting of specific worlds.
Commensal SETI leverages existing astronomical surveys like the Rubin Observatory and the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) to search for technosignatures within massive datasets, rather than relying solely on dedicated SETI programs.
Future SETI efforts will likely shift towards anomaly detection within vast astronomical data streams, using machine learning to identify non-natural variations rather than searching for predefined signal patterns.
The limitations of our historical SETI approach
For over 65 years, since Frank Drake's initial search in 1960, SETI efforts have largely focused on detecting narrow-band radio signals. This approach is based on assumptions about what a technological civilization, similar to our own relatively nascent stage, might transmit. Early SETI programs assumed aliens would use radio frequencies, particularly in the 'water hole' range (230-300 MHz), where the galactic radio background is weakest and it's between hydrogen and oxygen emission lines, creating a perceived 'galactic ham network.' This strategy aimed to detect a spike in a narrow frequency band, believing it would stand out against the cosmic noise. However, the lack of success with these extensive surveys suggests that perhaps there are no such signals to find, or more likely, that our search methodology needs a significant overhaul. The challenge with radio is that it's difficult to transmit a tightly focused beam. For a signal to flood Earth's entire orbit from 100 light-years away, a radio array with a 1000 km baseline would be needed. Even with such a large array, the signal's power is spread over an area 140 billion times the surface of Earth, requiring immense energy to be detectable above the galactic background. This energy limitation led to the hypothesis that civilizations would channel power into narrow bands, but this strategy has yielded no results so far.
The advanced alien assumption shapes the search
A crucial element in rethinking SETI is the consideration that any technological alien civilization we might detect has likely existed for far longer than humanity. If we assume a technological civilization lasts for, say, 10,000 years after developing detectable signals, humanity is only in its first century, representing the youngest 1%. This implies that 99% of detectable civilizations would be more advanced. Even with a survival time of just 1,000 years, most would still be ahead of us. If survival times are much shorter than 1,000 years, there's a chance of encountering civilizations at a comparable technological level, but the window for detecting them becomes vanishingly small—a mere fraction of the Milky Way's 10 billion-year lifespan. This 'advanced alien' perspective suggests focusing on finding signals from species that last longer, rather than those whose signals are fleeting and might only overlap with our brief technological epoch.
Shifting transmission technology to optical and infrared
With advancements in modern technology, especially in optics and infrared, we can now consider transmission methods far more efficient than radio for interstellar communication. Unlike radio waves, which are difficult to beam tightly and spread widely, lasers can transmit highly collimated visible and infrared light. This higher collimation means that arrays equivalent to the massive 1000km radio baselines used in early SETI could be achieved with much smaller apertures, potentially a 1-meter laser array. If a 1000km laser interferometer array were built, it could focus a signal to the scale of a single planet, not its entire orbit. This shift in transmission technology also ties into the targeting problem. In the 1960s, we didn't even know if exoplanets existed; now, we know that most stars host planets, and Earth-sized ones are common. Missions like Kepler have confirmed this statistical necessity. Future instruments like the Habitable Worlds Observatory, expected by the 2030s, aim to image exoplanets within hundreds of light-years, potentially revealing continents, oceans, and even city lights. Such capabilities would allow us to identify life-bearing worlds and target them directly, assuming a more advanced alien civilization in our vicinity would have already done the same.
New targeting strategies: From broad searches to planetary focus
Our understanding of exoplanets has revolutionized targeting capabilities for SETI. We now know that Earth-sized planets around Sun-like stars are common. The Kepler mission provided statistical evidence for this, and future endeavors like the Habitable Worlds Observatory will allow us to image these worlds directly, within hundreds of light-years, by the 2030s. This capability means a more advanced alien civilization, if it exists locally, would already know we are here and could precisely target signals towards us. This transforms SETI from a general search for any signal to a more informed hunt for directed transmissions aimed at potentially habitable planets.
Energy considerations for advanced civilizations
The assumption that alien civilizations are drastically energy-limited, as posited in early SETI, may no longer hold for advanced societies. Such civilizations could potentially pump more energy into more energy-efficient beams, allowing them to transmit messages across many frequencies simultaneously rather than in single, narrow bands. This increased energy capacity and beam efficiency could also enable them to send signals from much greater distances, potentially expanding the range of detectable communications.
The rise of commensal SETI and anomaly detection
The most significant paradigm shift in SETI is the move towards 'commensal SETI,' where extraterrestrial intelligence searches are piggybacked onto existing, large-scale astronomical surveys. These new surveys, such as the Rubin Observatory, the Euclid telescope, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), and the Square Kilometer Array (SKA), are producing unprecedented amounts of data. For instance, the Rubin Observatory will image the entire southern sky every three days. The challenge is selecting potential signals from this massive data flow without storing every byte. Research teams are developing sophisticated algorithms, often leveraging machine learning, to automatically monitor terabytes of data nightly for anomalies. While these systems are primarily designed to detect natural phenomena like supernovae or asteroids, they can also be adapted to spot unnatural variations or 'technosignatures.' This approach shifts the focus from searching for specific, expected signals (like encoded digits of pi) to identifying any signal that deviates significantly from natural processes – essentially, anomaly detection. Early studies, like one using HARPS exoplanet data, have shown that existing astronomical datasets may already contain technosignatures that we can analyze retrospectively or prospectively.
What constitutes a technological signal?
Distinguishing a technological signal from natural phenomena is a key challenge for SETI. Natural sources produce well-understood spectra from sources like hot gas, plasma, and charged particles in magnetic fields. Anomalies that could indicate a non-natural origin include frequency spikes in unexpected parts of the spectrum or unusual intensity patterns. Temporal variations, such as sudden or periodic changes in signal strength, might also reveal encoded information not possible for natural sources. While past 'teases,' like the Wow! signal or early pulsar detections, were eventually explained by natural processes, the hope is that as astronomical observations become more sensitive and comprehensive, we'll be able to recognize a technological signal when we see one. The current strategy leans towards anomaly detection rather than targeted searches for hypothetical alien messages. If a signal has a distinct frequency structure, its slight shifts due to Doppler effect as the planet orbits its star could provide further evidence of an artificial origin.
The future of SETI: Big data and the search for others
Modern astronomical facilities like the Rubin Observatory, Euclid, Roman, and the SKA are enabling 'big data' surveys of the universe with unparalleled breadth, depth, and resolution. These surveys, while primarily aimed at understanding natural cosmic phenomena, are poised to become the most effective SETI programs ever conceived. For example, research analyzing data from the Rubin Observatory suggests that its existing alert structures can be co-opted to find a variety of technosignatures, enabling a search at a scale that may reveal even the rarest signals. Similarly, the SKA, when fully operational, will generate an enormous volume of data that, with the right algorithms, could detect radio signals from extraterrestrial civilizations. The future of SETI lies in efficiently processing these vast datasets to identify anomalies that might indicate the presence of other intelligences in our corner of spacetime, moving beyond the assumptions of early SETI programs and embracing the power of new observational capabilities.
Mentioned in This Episode
●Products
●Software & Apps
●Companies
●People Referenced
Common Questions
Traditional SETI searches often assume alien civilizations would use radio transmissions and specific narrow bands, similar to humanity's current capabilities. This approach may be too anthropocentric, as more advanced civilizations could use more sophisticated or different methods like directed laser beams.
Topics
Mentioned in this video
A levitating pen product from Novium, featured as a sponsor and gift idea.
A proposed space telescope mission from the 1980s that aimed to image exo-Earths, which was canceled.
James Webb Space Telescope, mentioned as a factor in canceling the Terrestrial Planet Finder due to cost.
A space telescope mentioned for its wide-field capability.
A meteorite fragment embedded in a special edition of the Novium Hoverpen.
A future space telescope mission intended to image exo-Earths, picking up where the Terrestrial Planet Finder left off.
Pioneer of SETI who pointed the Green Bank radio telescope at Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridany.
A researcher whose new paper proposes updating SETI strategies based on advanced alien civilizations.
Lead author of a paper discussing the potential for the Rubin Observatory to detect technosignatures.
Co-author of a study showing HARPS data could be sensitive to laser communication.
More from PBS Space Time
View all 39 summaries
21 minWe Found Galaxies Too Old for the Universe
21 minMartian Soil Is Deadly. And That's Why It Might Support Life.
21 minMost of Reality Is Invisible. We May Finally Be About to Reveal It.
21 minThe Universe Is Racing Apart. We May Finally Know Why.
Ask anything from this episode.
Save it, chat with it, and connect it to Claude or ChatGPT. Get cited answers from the actual content — and build your own knowledge base of every podcast and video you care about.
Get Started Free