Key Moments

Using AI in Research | Stanford CS193T Guest Panel with Mark Algee-Hewitt, Megan Ma & Markus Covert

Stanford OnlineStanford Online
Education6 min read72 min video
Nov 12, 2026|973 views|46
Save to Pod
TL;DR

AI is not just for STEM; it's transforming humanities and law. However, its use raises ethical questions about authenticity, authorship, and the potential for misuse, demanding a focus on transparency and human oversight.

Key Insights

1

AI's ability to analyze vast text datasets allows for 'reading at scale,' identifying patterns imperceptible to human readers, as demonstrated in literary analysis.

2

The legal field faces challenges in defining quality and value, with AI's impact on billable hours and the potential to automate tasks previously reliant on individual lawyer intuition.

3

Simulations using AI can create realistic training scenarios for legal professionals, such as witness depositions, allowing practice in high-stakes environments without real-world consequences.

4

AI's role in bioengineering is advancing complex disease modeling, with the creation of full-cell simulations that predict phenotypic outcomes based on genetic content.

5

A significant concern in education is that students using AI tools may experience negative psychological impacts like depression and anxiety, alongside poorer learning outcomes.

6

Transparency in AI use is crucial, especially when claims of authorship or originality are involved, such as in recommendation letters or academic papers.

AI's expanding reach beyond STEM into humanities and law

The panel highlights how Artificial Intelligence is no longer confined to STEM fields but is actively being integrated into humanities and law. In English, AI aids in 'reading at scale,' analyzing vast textual data to identify patterns imperceptible to human readers, and exploring the relationship between style and meaning. The legal field, through initiatives like the 'Lift Lab,' is investigating AI's application in legal practice, focusing on aspects like case assessment, service delivery, and legal education. Bioengineering is leveraging AI for complex biological modeling, such as simulating entire cells to predict outcomes based on genetic data. This cross-disciplinary adoption underscores AI's versatility and its potential to revolutionize research methodologies and outcomes across academia.

Rethinking legal practice and education with AI

Megan Ma from Stanford's Law School discusses how AI is challenging traditional notions of quality and value in the legal profession. The billable-hour model is under pressure as AI can significantly improve productivity, raising questions about revenue models and the exposure of AI in legal work. The lab is exploring AI's role in legal education, developing AI-based simulation training for tasks like witness depositions and negotiations. These simulations aim to bridge the gap between law school learning and practical application, allowing for repeated practice in high-stakes scenarios. The development of AI 'legal partners' or 'digital twins' for senior partners is also being investigated, aiming to capture individual legal styles and decision-making nuances, though current AI tends to lean towards stereotypes.

AI in bioengineering: simulating life and complex systems

Markus Covert from Bioengineering emphasizes the complexity of diseases like cancer, which arise from interactions between numerous genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, rather than a single gene. His lab is building full-cell computational models that incorporate genetic content to predict phenotypic outcomes, simulating processes like bacterial growth, DNA replication, and cell division. These simulations generate vast amounts of data and can adapt to environmental changes, leading to altered cell behavior. Covert frames this work as 'artificial life,' distinct from traditional AI, and highlights its intersection with AI, particularly deep learning for image analysis and cell tracking. This advancement is crucial for understanding and treating complex biological systems.

The double-edged sword of AI in education

The panel acknowledges AI's potential to revolutionize education, but also its significant risks. A report from MIT revealed that students using AI tools experienced worse learning outcomes, increased depression, isolation, and anxiety. This has led some educators, like Mark Algee-Hewitt, to refrain from using AI for tasks like writing recommendation letters, prioritizing genuine human connection and quality over mere time-saving. The discussion points to the danger of students outsourcing cognitive abilities, potentially leaving university without acquiring essential skills. The need to balance AI's utility with the preservation of critical thinking and human judgment is paramount, ensuring AI augments, rather than replaces, genuine learning.

Navigating ethical dilemmas and the demand for transparency

A core concern throughout the discussion is the ethical use of AI and the need for transparency. When AI is used for tasks like writing recommendation letters or academic papers, the lack of disclosure can lead to a loss of personal voice and trust. The legal profession sees young lawyers hesitant to use AI due to high-profile cases of AI generating false legal citations, creating tension with partners who encourage its use. Mark Algee-Hewitt proposes radical transparency as the solution, advocating for clear disclosure of AI usage in academic and professional contexts to foster dialogue and allow for informed opinions. This transparency is seen as essential for developing societal norms and trust around AI.

Defining essential human skills in the age of AI

Panelists identified critical human skills that remain indispensable despite AI advancements. Critical thinking was highlighted as paramount, enabling individuals to interpret information, rely on their own intellect and experiences, and avoid over-reliance on AI for cognitive tasks. In law, 'judgment' was emphasized, involving the ability to build a necessary reference library of experiences and to craft narratives. The concept of 'scientific taste'—knowing what problems are worth solving and how to make a unique impact—was also mentioned. The ability to think critically, engage in deep reflection, collaborate with others, and possess intellectual 'dual-bravery' to combine knowledge from different fields are seen as vital for navigating a future where AI handles routine tasks.

AI as a tool for augmentation, not replacement

The conversation consistently circles back to AI's role as a tool for augmentation. Rather than having AI perform tasks entirely, the focus should be on how it can enhance human capabilities. For example, AI can be used to generate creative prompts or provide alternative perspectives, pushing human users to think more deeply and produce higher-quality work, as seen in the example of writing research paper paragraphs. In education, AI can facilitate game design by handling mechanical aspects, allowing students to focus on the creative process. The underlying principle is to leverage AI to extend human potential, encouraging curiosity and deeper engagement, rather than allowing it to diminish our own cognitive abilities.

The future of AI: a 'seismic shift' and the importance of human ingenuity

The panelists agreed that the current AI revolution is just the beginning, potentially a 'seismic shift' compared to earlier technological advancements like the rise of Google. They stressed the importance of embracing AI, learning to use it effectively, but crucially, not at the expense of developing fundamental human skills. The goal is to use AI to tackle previously insurmountable problems, fostering radical new ideas and communication. The ultimate aim is to ensure AI empowers humanity to solve complex challenges, inspire innovation, and create new connections, rather than simply providing shortcuts or replacements for human intellect and effort. This requires a continued focus on human curiosity, critical thinking, and a commitment to pushing the boundaries of what's possible.

Common Questions

AI is employed in humanities research for tasks like analyzing large volumes of text to identify patterns, conducting in-depth analysis of specific texts, and studying patterns in correspondence networks. It also serves as a subject of analysis, particularly concerning AI-generated writing styles and their impact on meaning.

Topics

Mentioned in this video

More from Stanford Online

View all 175 summaries

Ask anything from this episode.

Save it, chat with it, and connect it to Claude or ChatGPT. Get cited answers from the actual content — and build your own knowledge base of every podcast and video you care about.

Get Started Free