Key Moments
How to study for exams - Evidence-based revision tips
Key Moments
Use active recall, not rereading or highlighting, for better exam prep.
Key Insights
Rereading, highlighting, and summarizing are popular but less effective revision techniques.
Active recall, or testing yourself, is a highly effective strategy for strengthening memory.
Evidence shows active recall significantly outperforms passive study methods like rereading.
Practical active recall methods include using flashcards (like Anki), making notes with books closed, and writing/answering questions.
Our intuition about effective study methods often contradicts scientific evidence.
Future revision strategies should incorporate active recall and spaced repetition for optimal results.
INEFFECTIVE POPULAR REVISION TECHNIQUES
Many students rely on rereading, highlighting, and summarizing as their primary study methods. However, psychological research consistently demonstrates these techniques have low utility. Rereading, despite its popularity, provides minimal benefit to learning. Highlighting, while it can feel productive, often fails to improve performance, especially on complex tasks requiring inference. Summarizing can be effective for those already skilled, but for most students, it is time-consuming and less impactful than other methods. The evidence suggests these commonly used strategies are not the most efficient for exam preparation.
THE POWER OF ACTIVE RECALL
In contrast to passive methods, active recall, also known as practice testing or active retrieval, is identified as a highly effective study technique. This strategy involves actively retrieving information from memory, which strengthens neural connections. Decades of research indicate that the act of recalling information is more beneficial for learning than simply trying to re-ingest it through rereading. This often goes against students' intuitive understanding of learning, which tends to focus on input rather than output.
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR ACTIVE RECALL
Multiple studies provide robust evidence for the effectiveness of active recall. Early research from the 1930s showed that students who engaged in practice tests achieved significantly higher scores compared to those who only restudied material. More recent studies from 2010 and 2011 further confirm these findings, demonstrating that active recall improves performance on both factual recall and higher-level inference questions. Critically, students often underestimate the effectiveness of active recall, rating passive methods like repeated studying as superior, highlighting a disconnect between student perception and scientific findings.
AN IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVE RECALL: ANKI
An effective tool for implementing active recall is flashcard software like Anki. This application uses spaced repetition, presenting information at intervals tailored to the user's recall ability. By marking cards as easy, medium, or hard, users train the algorithm to re-expose them to challenging material more frequently. Anki is particularly useful for memorizing discrete facts, such as anatomical terms or drug mechanisms, and can also be adapted for memorizing chunks of information, like key studies or concepts for essays, significantly aiding recall during exams.
ACTIVE RECALL THROUGH CLOSED-BOOK METHODS
Active recall can also be practiced without specialized software by employing closed-book methods. Creating notes or diagrams after studying a topic, rather than copying directly from a textbook, forces retrieval of information. Students can write down everything they remember about a subject and then check against their materials to fill in gaps. This method, especially when combined with spaced repetition, has been linked to significant improvements in exam performance, allowing students to build robust knowledge bases that can be readily accessed during assessments.
GENERATING QUESTIONS FOR ACTIVE RETRIEVAL
Another practical strategy for active recall is to generate questions based on the study material. Instead of passively reading or highlighting, students can formulate questions that require them to retrieve specific information or explain concepts. During revision, these questions serve as prompts for active retrieval, either mentally or in writing. This process necessitates cognitive effort, strengthening memory traces. This technique has been shown to be highly effective, leading to superior performance in exams by encouraging deeper engagement with the material.
INTEGRATING ACTIVE RECALL WITH SPACED REPETITION
The most potent revision strategy involves combining active recall with spaced repetition. While active recall ensures information is retrieved, spaced repetition ensures it is revisited at optimal intervals to combat forgetting. This dual approach, supported by extensive research and highlighted in resources like the book 'Make It Stick,' challenges traditional study habits. By shifting focus from passive consumption to active retrieval and strategic review, students can dramatically improve their learning efficiency and long-term retention, ultimately leading to better exam outcomes.
Mentioned in This Episode
●Software & Apps
●Organizations
●Books
●Concepts
Evidence-Based Revision Strategies
Practical takeaways from this episode
Do This
Avoid This
Comparison of Study Techniques Based on Professor Dunloski's Review
Data extracted from this episode
| Technique | Utility Rating | Effectiveness Compared to Others |
|---|---|---|
| Rereading | Low | Much less effective |
| Highlighting/Underlining | Low | Does little to boost performance, may hurt higher-level tasks |
| Summarization | Low | Falls in the middle of the pack, requires skill |
| Practice Testing (Active Recall) | High | Highly effective, implemented with minimal training |
Impact of Practice Testing on Exam Performance (1939 Study)
Data extracted from this episode
| Group | High Achievers Performance | Bottom Third Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Studied Normally (Control) | Approx. 50% | Approx. 30% |
| Studied + Practice Test | Approx. 65-70% | Approx. 40-45% |
Impact of Practice Testing on Exam Performance (2010 Study)
Data extracted from this episode
| Group | Factual Recall Performance | Conceptual Recall Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Restudied Material Normally | 30-40% | 30-40% |
| Studied + Practice Test | 60-90% | 60-90% |
Effectiveness of Different Study Methods on Exam Performance (2011 Study)
Data extracted from this episode
| Group | Verbatim Questions Performance | Inference Questions Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Study Once | Lowest | Worst |
| Study Four Times | Higher than Study Once | Mid-range |
| Read Once + Mind Map | Higher than Study Once | Mid-range |
| Read Once + Active Recall | Significantly Better than study four times | Best |
Student Perceptions vs. Evidence on Study Techniques (2011 Study)
Data extracted from this episode
| Study Technique | Student Perception of Effectiveness | Actual Effectiveness (Evidence) |
|---|---|---|
| Repeated Study | Most Useful | Ineffective/Low Utility |
| Active Recall | Least Effective | Highly Effective |
Common Questions
The most common study techniques, rereading, highlighting, and making notes/summarizing, are shown by research to be among the least effective. While they might feel productive, they don't strongly enhance long-term retention or understanding.
Topics
Mentioned in this video
More from Ali Abdaal
View all 180 summaries
18 minBrutally Honest Truth On How To Get Rich
25 minIf I Started A Business in 2026, I'd Do This
26 minSuccess Is Hard Until You Build Systems Like This
21 minThe mindset slowly destroying your life
Found this useful? Build your knowledge library
Get AI-powered summaries of any YouTube video, podcast, or article in seconds. Save them to your personal pods and access them anytime.
Try Summify free