Why did Dan Carlin resist the move to video for his podcast?

Carlin cites empathy for his audience, believing they primarily want to listen and that the visual aspect isn't necessary. The technical difficulties of video setup also reinforced his decision to stick with audio.

How does Dan Carlin structure his live tour events?

Carlin's live events are typically unstructured talks, often with a guest, followed by audience questions. The unpredictability is part of the appeal, making each event unique rather than a rehearsed show.

What does Dan Carlin mean by 'authenticity' in the digital age?

As digital content becomes more artificial or generated, Carlin believes there's a growing human thirst for authentic, real-life experiences and interactions, like live performances, which cannot be faked.

How does Dan Carlin define his own political stance?

He describes his politics as a 'party of one,' independent of traditional party lines. His approach, honed through years of radio, involves engaging with diverse viewpoints and learning from disagreement rather than preaching to a choir.

What is Dan Carlin's long-term view on the state of American politics?

Carlin sees current political developments as the culmination of decades of systemic issues, including the growth of executive power and the weakening of constitutional guardrails. He believes problems are rarely one-sided and take a long view of historical trends.

Why has presidential power in the US grown so significantly?

The expansion of presidential power is a historical trend dating back to the founding, fueled by the 'Swiss cheesing' of the Constitution, weakening of checks and balances, and evolving norms. Executive orders and signing statements have become more aggressively used tools.

Can presidential powers be effectively curtailed in the current political climate?

Carlin suggests it's counterintuitive for politicians to propose reducing their own power, as it's often seen as unilateral disarmament in a system incentivized to push boundaries. The focus tends to be on wielding existing power rather than limiting it.

Dan Carlin Explains Why Autocracy in America Was Inevitable (Making Sense #433)

Sam Harris

Science & Technology3 min read23 min video

Sep 6, 2025|252,931 views|5,040|1,346

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

Dan Carlin and Sam Harris discuss the inevitable slide towards autocracy in America, driven by systemic issues and changing norms.

Key Insights

The growth of presidential power and weakening of constitutional guardrails have made autocracy more likely.

Historical precedents and the increasing disregard for established norms have eroded checks and balances.

The current political climate allows leaders to exploit existing imbalances and norms without significant consequence.

The nature of modern media and incentives in politics exacerbate division and hinder constructive dialogue.

A shift towards seeking authenticity in live, unscripted interactions may arise as a reaction to digital saturation.

The tendency for human beings to deceive themselves about uncomfortable realities plays a role in societal acceptance of problematic trends.

THE EVOLUTION OF PRESIDENTIAL POWER

The conversation begins with reflections on the evolution of podcasting and the challenges of establishing a presence in a saturated market. Dan Carlin emphasizes his commitment to long-form, evergreen content, likening it to book publishing where quality trumps immediate release schedules. He contrasts this with the current media landscape's demand for constant content, highlighting his focus on audience value over quantity. This sets a tone for his long-term perspective on historical and political issues, a perspective that informs his views on American governance.

A LONG-TERM VIEW OF AMERICAN POLITICS

Carlin frames current political developments not as recent phenomena but as the culmination of decades of systemic shifts. He notes that many contemporary issues, like the growth of executive power and the 'hollowing out' of constitutional guardrails, have been long in the making. This extended timeline suggests that current problems are not isolated incidents but rather the predictable outcome of gradual erosion, which makes them appear like 'dominoes tumbling' towards a discernible end state.

THE EROSION OF NORMS AND RISE OF THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY

A significant concern discussed is the weakening of unwritten rules and norms that previously constrained presidential power. The shift from reliance on laws to reliance on norms, and then the disregard for these norms, especially highlighted during the Trump administration, has opened the door for more aggressive executive action. This phenomenon, echoing Arthur Schlesinger Jr.'s 'Imperial Presidency' concerns from the 1970s, has seen presidential powers expand significantly since that era, yet public discourse has not kept pace with this growth.

SYSTEMIC INCENTIVES AND POLITICAL HYPOCRISY

The current political system is characterized by incentives that foster division and hinder efforts to address systemic issues. The conversation touches on 'partisan and hyper-partisanship' as a pillar of Carlin's 'Common Sense' podcast, noting how financial gain can be derived from dividing Americans. Furthermore, the system makes it counterintuitive for politicians to campaign on curtailing presidential power, as such a stance could be perceived as weakness or unilateral disarmament, thus perpetuating the cycle of escalating executive authority.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF DECEPTION AND AUTHENTICITY

Both speakers observe a disturbing human tendency to self-deceive, particularly in the face of uncomfortable political realities. People often choose not to 'smell the brimstone,' preferring to ignore or rationalize away troubling trends. Conversely, the increasing saturation of digital content and artificiality may drive a yearning for authenticity, potentially reviving interest in live, unscripted performances. This search for genuine human connection and unvarnished reality is seen as a potential counterbalance to the digital swamp.

THE 'QUANTITY HAS QUALITY' EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE ACTIONS

The discussion highlights how actions once considered extreme or rare when performed by one president become normalized when aggregated across multiple presidencies. Carlin uses the example of executive orders and signing statements, noting that while they have always existed, their use has intensified and broadened in scope. He argues that a president doing the 'most constitutionally extreme' action of several past presidents, combined, represents a significant qualitative leap in presidential power, even if each individual action has a precedent.

THE IMPLICATIONS OF DIVIDE AND CONQUER STRATEGIES

The conversation touches upon the dangerous implications of 'divide and conquer' strategies employed in modern politics, specifically referencing the rhetoric distinguishing 'my supporters' from 'bad Americans.' Carlin points out that a leader now possesses unprecedented power to inflict harm, potentially on a global scale. When such divisions are amplified and coupled with immense power, the question arises about how society will respond when destructive actions, like bombings and casualties, inevitably occur.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Software & Apps

●Books

●Concepts

●People Referenced

Common Questions

Dan Carlin believes in focusing on the quality of 'evergreen' content rather than rapid, topical releases. He prioritizes making content that will resonate with future audiences, akin to a book, over meeting the immediate demands of current listeners.

Topics

Hardcore History Common Sense Evergreen Content Executive Orders Constitutionalism Democracies

Mentioned in this video

legislationExecutive Order

A directive issued by the President, discussed as a tool whose use has expanded significantly, contributing to concerns about unchecked executive power.

conceptConstitutional Imbalances

The idea that the U.S. system is prone to shifts in power, particularly towards the executive, and that each administration tends to build upon the imbalances of the previous one.

personArthur Schlesinger

Author of a book on the 'imperial presidency' from the early 1970s, referenced to discuss the historical context of presidential power.

conceptFall of Rome

The historical decline and fall of the Western Roman Empire, used as a historical parallel to discuss potential societal and political degradation.

conceptImperial Presidency

A term describing an expansion of power by the U.S. presidency beyond constitutional limits, a recurring concern discussed in relation to historical and contemporary presidencies.

legislationArticles of Confederation

The first governing document of the United States, referenced as a precursor to the Constitution where questions about executive power and its balance already existed.

legislationSigning Statement

A written expression of the President's opinion accompanying the signing of a bill into law, discussed in the context of its evolving use to assert presidential prerogative.

bookCommon Sense