Key Moments

CA Governor Candidate Steve Hilton on Why California is Destroying Itself & How a Republican Can Win

All-In PodcastAll-In Podcast
Entertainment6 min read69 min video
Apr 29, 2026|34,441 views|1,742|275
Save to Pod
TL;DR

California's cost of living is crippling residents, with extreme regulations and union power driving up housing costs threefold and making basic necessities unaffordable for over a third of citizens.

Key Insights

1

Over a third of Californians cannot afford to meet basic needs, according to a United Way report.

2

Building the same home in California costs two to three times more than in neighboring states.

3

California has the highest gas prices in the country due to a combination of taxes and regulations, with nearly 80% of its oil now imported, primarily from Iraq.

4

California spends over $27,000 per student per year on education, yet less than half of students meet basic standards in English and reading.

5

Tens of thousands of dangerous criminals have been released from state prisons due to closure programs, leading to overcrowded county jails and a 'catch and release' system.

6

Over 80% of homeless individuals in California struggle with drug/alcohol addiction or severe mental health issues, compounded by inefficient state spending and outdated regulations.

A Republican Brit's unlikely bid for California governor

Steve Hilton, a British immigrant and naturalized American citizen, is running for Governor of California. Drawing inspiration from his parents' experience as refugees from communism and Margaret Thatcher's economic policies, Hilton aims to address what he views as California's severe economic decline and overregulation. He positions himself as a pro-worker, pro-growth candidate, advocating for significant policy shifts to revitalize the state. His unique background as a non-Californian, outsider candidate sets the stage for his unconventional policy proposals.

Pro-worker tax plan: Zero tax under $100K, 7.5% flat rate above

Hilton's signature policy proposal is a radical tax reform: no state income tax for individuals or households earning under $100,000, and a flat 7.5% tax for all income above that threshold. This plan aims to provide immediate relief to struggling working families, noting that $100,000 is considered 'low income' in many parts of California. He argues this is fiscally possible by drastically cutting state spending, reducing the budget to pre-pandemic levels (approximately a 75% increase in spending over five years needs to be reversed). The proposal intends to attract investment, stimulate growth, and simplify the tax code, which he claims is overly complex and burdensome.

Rampant fraud and waste drain $80 billion annually

Hilton's campaign has identified significant fraud and waste within California's state budget, estimating it at around $80 billion per year, or roughly 20% of the total budget. Examples cited include the climate change mitigation fund, where out of $1 billion allocated for solar panels on low-income housing over 10 years, only $72 million was spent on the intended purpose, with the rest going to political nonprofits. Similarly, $350 million in cannabis tax revenue meant for substance abuse prevention was diverted to activism and voter registration. A $3.8 billion 'Project Home Key' initiative for homelessness also saw significant funds mismanaged. This pervasive inefficiency, Hilton argues, is a primary reason for the state's fiscal distress and the need to return to more prudent spending levels.

Housing crisis driven by unions, litigation, and climate dogma

The prohibitive cost of housing in California, Hilton states, is a symptom of three intertwined structural issues: the immense power of unions, extensive litigation, and an extreme 'climate dogma.' He explains that building costs are two to three times higher than in neighboring states. This is exacerbated by overly stringent building codes mandating expensive features like EV charging infrastructure and solar panels, and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA allows for lawsuits that often block housing projects, frequently initiated by unions to force project labor agreements with inflated wages and union-only labor requirements. These factors, combined with high government fees ($30,000 per door in California versus under $1,000 in Texas), severely limit housing supply and drive up costs for residents.

Education spending is high, but results are abysmal

California spends over $27,000 per student annually, among the highest in the nation, yet achieves some of the worst educational outcomes. Only 47% of students meet basic English standards, and just 35% meet basic math standards. Hilton attributes this failure largely to the grip of teacher unions on the public school monopoly. He criticizes their focus on political agendas, exemplified by lengthy pandemic school closures and demands unrelated to education. He advocates for long-term structural reform through school choice and immediate practical measures like implementing phonics-based reading instruction and mandatory grade retention if students don't achieve reading proficiency by third grade. Furthermore, he proposes a grading system for schools and teachers to incentivize better performance and accountability.

Reversing prison closures and enforcing existing laws to combat crime

Hilton argues that California's crime problem stems from a failure to enforce existing laws and a misguided decarceration agenda. He highlights the reversal of Proposition 47, which had legalized theft up to $950, stressing that while it has been overturned, enforcement is weak. A major focus is reversing the closure of state prisons initiated by previous administrations, which has led to overcrowded county jails and a 'catch and release' system where offenders are often immediately freed. By increasing prison capacity, Hilton believes accountability can be restored, and rehabilitated individuals can be reintegrated more effectively, citing Virginia's lower recidivism rates as a model. He also points to the large percentage of incarcerated individuals with untreated mental health issues as a critical problem.

A three-pronged approach to ending homelessness

Addressing homelessness, Hilton contends, requires enforcing existing laws, mandating sobriety for treatment, and reforming mental healthcare. He notes that living in encampments is already illegal and that recent court rulings remove excuses for inaction. His plan includes removing encampments and immediately offering help. Over 80% of homeless individuals struggle with addiction or severe mental illness; therefore, his plan mandates drug and alcohol recovery programs and requires sobriety for state services. He also criticizes the 'IMD rule' in Medicaid, which restricts funding for mental health facilities over 16 beds, and proposes using state funds to build larger, more efficient mental health facilities, citing that many individuals in jails suffer from severe mental health issues.

Path to Victory: A 'Change vs. More of the Same' Election

Hilton believes a Republican can win California by framing the election as a choice between fundamental change and continued decline. Despite the state's Democratic registration advantage, he notes that Republican votes have historically hovered around 40%, and current 'wrong track' sentiment favors change. His strategy involves mobilizing Republican voters, potentially boosted by a voter ID ballot initiative, and appealing to a multi-racial working-class coalition by emphasizing his tax plan – no state income tax up to $100,000, a flat 7.5% tax above, and no tax on tips. He aims to offer simple, common-sense solutions like affordable housing, lower gas and electric bills, and a focus on core problems, believing this message will resonate with voters tired of the current dysfunction. He acknowledges the difficulty but stresses the importance of offering an alternative to the status quo.

California Governor Candidate Steve Hilton's Platform Snapshot

Practical takeaways from this episode

Do This

Support lower taxes: 0% state income tax for income under $100K, 7.5% flat tax for above.
Advocate for energy independence: Increase in-state oil production.
Implement school choice and phonics-based reading instruction.
Reverse prison closures and increase capacity.
Enforce laws against homelessness and mandate recovery/mental health treatment.
Simplify tax code and reduce government spending.
Focus on common-sense, practical policy solutions.

Avoid This

Don't increase taxes on businesses or high earners.
Don't rely on regulations that increase building costs (e.g., CEQA).
Don't allow teacher unions to dictate educational policy.
Don't continue the 'catch and release' approach to crime.
Don't fund the 'homeless industrial complex' without guaranteed results.
Don't be constrained by partisan ideology over practical outcomes.

Common Questions

Steve Hilton proposes a tax plan with no state income tax for individuals earning under $100,000 and a flat tax of 7.5% for those earning over $100,000. This aims to provide relief to working families and stimulate economic growth.

Topics

Mentioned in this video

Legislation & Policy
Prop 64

Prop 64 legalized cannabis in California, with taxes intended for substance abuse prevention, but funds were allegedly misallocated.

Project Homekey

A program aimed at housing homeless individuals by acquiring and converting properties; Hilton's team found significant cost overruns and misallocation of funds.

California Environmental Quality Act

Environmental regulations in California that Hilton argues contribute to high construction costs and housing shortages, often leveraged by unions to block projects.

Prop 47

A California ballot proposition that decriminalized certain offenses; part of it was overturned by Prop 36 but not fully enforced.

Prop 36

A California proposition that overturned parts of Prop 47, aimed at addressing theft, but its enforcement is facing resistance.

Boise ruling

A Ninth Circuit court ruling that prevented cities from removing homeless encampments without sufficient shelter availability; has since been overturned by Grants Pass v. Oregon.

Grants Pass v. Oregon

A 2024 Supreme Court case that overturned the Boise ruling, allowing for the removal of homeless encampments.

Sober Housing Act

A bill passed by the Democrat legislature that would have allocated funds for sober housing but was vetoed.

IMD rule

Institutions for Mental Disease rule that restricts Medicaid reimbursement for mental health care in facilities larger than 16 beds.

Global Warming Solutions Act

California legislation passed in 2006 that is cited as the starting point for climate policies leading to increased oil imports and high gas prices.

More from All-In Podcast

View all 404 summaries

Ask anything from this episode.

Save it, chat with it, and connect it to Claude or ChatGPT. Get cited answers from the actual content — and build your own knowledge base of every podcast and video you care about.

Get Started Free