Key Moments

Body Recomposition, Estimating Energy Expenditure, and Sex Differences in the Bench Press (Ep 84)

Stronger By ScienceStronger By Science
Sports5 min read122 min video
Apr 28, 2022|9,224 views|273|32
Save to Pod
TL;DR

Podcast covers recomposition, energy expenditure, sex differences in bench press, and training around injuries, featuring "Best of MASS" research.

Key Insights

1

Body recomposition (building muscle and losing fat simultaneously) is feasible for many individuals, especially the untrained or those with significant body fat.

2

Energy deficits impair lean mass gains more than strength gains; the larger the deficit, the more challenging it is to build muscle.

3

Resistance training burns approximately 6 kcal per minute, a heuristic that holds true for most standard workouts but may vary.

4

Sex differences in the bench press may exist, with females potentially relying more on triceps and males on pecs at sub-maximal loads.

5

External attentional focus appears to enhance acute strength performance and may lead to greater strength gains over time compared to internal focus.

6

While sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is possible, individual responses to training vary widely, and its predictive factors are still being researched.

INTRODUCTION AND PODCAST OVERVIEW

The Stronger By Science podcast episode, hosted by Eric Trexler and Greg, discusses various fitness and research topics. The conversation highlights how listeners can support the podcast through subscriptions, newsletters, and app usage. A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to reviewing articles from the 'Best of MASS' issue, a collection of their favorite research from the past year, available for free download.

FEATS OF STRENGTH AND TRAINING MODIFICATIONS

The episode begins by acknowledging Christopher Burr-Bicky's impressive deadlift, ranking among the all-time heaviest. A discussion follows on the controversial topic of allowing straps in powerlifting, with the argument that it could increase accessibility. Eric shares a personal breakthrough in managing chronic hip and pelvic pain, diagnosing it as a nerve entrapment issue after years of seeking help. He details his current approach to training around this injury, focusing on specific movements and avoiding those that exacerbate pain.

NAVIGATING HIP PAIN AND ADAPTING TRAINING

Eric elaborates on his strategy for training with hip pain, emphasizing that this is not medical advice but his personal approach. He has been focusing on hip flexion and adduction, avoiding deep hip flexion, and utilizing free weights and cables. Upper body training also involves modifications to prevent excessive lumbar flexion. For cardio, he has found success with basketball, rope climbers, and swimming, as these activities allow for controlled hip movement and hip flexor strengthening without aggravating his condition.

BODY RECOMPOSITION: FEASIBILITY AND EVIDENCE

The podcast delves into the concept of body recomposition, the simultaneous pursuit of fat loss and muscle gain. Eric discusses his article on this topic, which reviews a meta-analysis by Murphy et al. (2021) on energy deficiency's impact on resistance training. The findings suggest that while energy deficits significantly impair lean mass gains, they have a less pronounced effect on strength gains. The study indicated that a deficit of around 500 calories per day might blunt lean mass gains, but this is a model-based prediction, not a strict law.

ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND RESISTANCE TRAINING METRICS

Greg reviews a study by Zhao et al. that aimed to create a heuristic for estimating energy expenditure during resistance training. The research found that various resistance training protocols (different sets, reps, and intensities) resulted in approximately 6 kilocalories burned per minute, with a range of 4 to 8 kcal. This estimate is comparable to a brisk walking pace and is considered a reasonable ballpark figure for general resistance training sessions, though it may not apply to extremely high-volume or specialized protocols.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN BENCH PRESS BIOMECHANICS

Another article discussed examines sex differences in bench press technique and muscle activation by Mouser, Hunt, and Crossog. The study found that, on average, female benchers exhibited more triceps dominance, while male benchers showed more pec dominance, supported by EMG and joint moment data. This contrasts with findings at maximal loads, suggesting potential sex-based differences in how the nervous system recruits muscles during the bench press, with females potentially leaning more on triceps at sub-maximal loads and males more on pecs.

ATTENTIONAL FOCUS AND STRENGTH DEVELOPMENT

The meta-analysis by Gurgic et al. on attentional focus strategies is reviewed, exploring the impact of internal (focusing on body sensations) versus external (focusing on the outcome) cues on strength. Acutely, an external focus was found to enhance strength performance. While longitudinal data is limited, the evidence suggests that an external focus may also lead to greater strength gains over time, though this is more pronounced for lower body measures and appears to be heavily influenced by study design, particularly the inclusion of specific muscle groups like the biceps.

SARCOPLASMIC HYPERTRO জৈ

Greg discusses a study by Rupa et al. on sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, defining it as a disproportionate increase in the non-contractile portion of muscle fibers. The research on untrained men after 10 weeks of resistance training showed no significant average change in myofibrillar density, indicating balanced growth. However, individual responses varied widely, with some experiencing considerable myofibrillar packing and others significant sarcoplasmic hypertrophy. This suggests that while the average response is balanced, personal variation is substantial, and the concept of 'bro science' dismissal of sarcoplasmic hypertrophy may be unfounded.

ADDITIONAL RESEARCH ARTICLES AND MEDIA RECOMMENDATIONS

The episode highlights other articles in the 'Best of MASS' issue, including those on plant-based proteins, collagen supplementation, energy compensation during dieting, the utility of wearable technologies, and the effectiveness of cold exposure for fat loss. Media recommendations for 'Severance' and 'Slow Horses' are given, while 'Is It Cake?' is strongly advised against, with the hosts humorously reflecting on outdated nutrition theories and problematic researchers like Gary Taubes, Brian Wansink, and David Avocado Wolfe.

Common Questions

You can download the 'Best of MASS' issue for free at strongerbyscience.com/mass-best-of. It compiles favorite articles from the past year.

Topics

Mentioned in this video

More from Stronger By Science

View all 153 summaries

Found this useful? Build your knowledge library

Get AI-powered summaries of any YouTube video, podcast, or article in seconds. Save them to your personal pods and access them anytime.

Try Summify free