How has Robert D. Kaplan's view of the future held up over the past 30 years?

Kaplan believes his general prognosis has held up well, as the predicted anarchy in places like Sierra Leone served as models for later instability in Libya, Syria, and Iraq, and his ideas challenged the dominant policy elite's view of a universally democratic future.

Why does Robert D. Kaplan see environmental issues as a central security concern?

He argues that climate change, coupled with rising populations in developing countries, leads to scarcity of water and arable land. This pressure causes migration to overcrowded cities, increasing instability and making governance more challenging.

What is the significance of the Weimar Republic analogy in Kaplan's book 'Wasteland'?

Kaplan uses the Weimar Republic's period of weak governments and constant crisis (1918-1933) as an analogy for the modern world. He suggests that interconnectedness through technology and finance creates a global, anxious claustrophobia, leading to permanent crisis rather than a singular authoritarian figure.

According to Kaplan, why is order more important than freedom in establishing democratic institutions?

Kaplan believes that anarchy represents the most frightening political reality, and without order, freedom is impossible for anyone. He emphasizes that while avoiding tyranny is crucial, the fear of chaos necessitates a strong foundation of order first, referencing the founders' debates in the Federalist Papers.

Why is Putin considered a more dangerous leader than previous Soviet rulers?

Unlike the cautious, collegial leadership of the Soviet Politburo during the Cold War, Putin governs alone as a risk-taker. His potential incapacitation could lead to Russia's descent into chaos, similar to the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s.

What did the war in Ukraine reveal about Russia's military capabilities?

The invasion exposed Russia's severe lack of logistics, which are critical for large-scale military operations. While Russia had faked success in smaller conflicts like in Syria, the Ukraine war demonstrated the weakness of its operational capacity.

Are We Experiencing a Global Emergency? (feat. Robert D. Kaplan)

Sam Harris

Science & Technology4 min read27 min video

Oct 24, 2025|113,536 views|1,813|402

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

The world faces constant global crisis due to weak governance, fragmented societies, and unchecked populism, akin to the Weimar Republic.

Key Insights

The world is experiencing a 'global Weimar Republic' characterized by weak governments and perpetual crisis, not necessarily leading to a single dictator but chronic paralysis.

Environmental concerns, now known as climate change, are a primary security issue due to demographic pressures, water scarcity, and mass migration leading to urbanization and instability.

Authoritarianism and populism are fueled by demographic shifts and migration, particularly the growing population in Africa and the Middle East impacting Europe.

Order must precede freedom; durable democratic institutions are more crucial than abstract democratic ideals, especially when attempting to export democracy.

Vladimir Putin represents a unique danger as a risk-taking autocrat ruling alone, unlike the collegial and cautious Soviet leadership during the Cold War.

The war in Ukraine revealed Russia's military weaknesses, particularly in logistics, despite prior perceptions of invincibility in smaller conflicts.

THE GLOBAL WEIMAR ANALOGY

Robert D. Kaplan draws a compelling analogy between the current global landscape and the Weimar Republic (1918-1933). He emphasizes that the concern isn't a direct repeat of Hitler's rise, but rather the prolonged period of weak, ineffective governments and political paralysis. This era, marked by constant crisis and an inability to govern, offers a powerful metaphor for today's interconnected yet fractured world, where technological advancements have shrunk geography and amplified anxieties without establishing effective control.

THE CENTRALITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC PRESSURES

Kaplan reiterates his long-held view that environmental issues are a primary security concern for the 21st century, now largely framed as climate change. This is intrinsically linked to burgeoning populations in developing nations, particularly in Africa, where dwindling resources like water and fertile soil strain food production. These pressures drive migration from rural to increasingly unstable urban centers, creating complex governance challenges and fueling social unrest.

URBANIZATION AND MIGRATION AS DRIVERS OF INSTABILITY

The demographic shifts he discusses are stark, with projections indicating massive growth in Africa's population and its concentration in mega-cities. This rapid urbanization strains infrastructure and governance, making these areas harder to manage and satisfy. The resulting migration, especially from Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, is seen as a potent force that will continue to fuel populism and political instability in Europe and beyond for decades.

ORDER BEFORE FREEDOM AND THE IMPORTANCE OF INSTITUTIONS

Kaplan argues for the primacy of order over freedom, asserting that genuine freedom is impossible without a foundational level of stability. He uses historical examples, including the anxieties of America's founders regarding chaos, to underscore the necessity of robust institutions. He critiques the overemphasis on democratic ideals at the expense of building durable governing structures, citing the failures in nation-building attempts as evidence that strong institutions are the bedrock of successful governance.

THE UNIQUE DANGER OF PUTIN'S RUSSIA

Comparing Vladimir Putin to past Soviet leaders, Kaplan distinguishes him as a dangerous, solitary risk-taker, unlike the cautious, collegial Politburo of the Cold War era. The absence of collective leadership around Putin creates uncertainty about succession and Russia's future trajectory. This personal rule, coupled with demonstrable military ambition, makes him the most concerning Russian leader since Stalin, posing a significant threat on the global stage.

UKRAINE WAR REVEALS RUSSIAN WEAKNESS

The invasion of Ukraine, contrary to initial expectations of a swift Russian victory, exposed significant weaknesses in the Russian military, particularly in logistics. Despite perceived successes in smaller conflicts like Syria, the large-scale operation in Ukraine highlighted a lack of coordination and support infrastructure. Ukraine's resilience in withstanding the Russian military machine for an extended period underscores these revealed vulnerabilities, challenging prior assumptions about Russian military might.

THE FRAGILITY OF GLOBAL COHERENCE

The era of clear global order, whether defined by the bipolar Cold War or subsequent unipolar American leadership, has definitively ended. Kaplan posits that the world now exists in a state of perpetual, interconnected crisis. Proximity, facilitated by technology and financial markets, means nations are constantly influencing each other, fostering a pervasive sense of anxiety, yet without any single entity capable of imposing or maintaining decisive control.

INSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS COMPARED TO IDEALS

Drawing on Samuel Huntington, Kaplan highlights that America's strength lies not in its people's character but in its deeply ingrained institutional separation of powers across federal, state, and local levels. He contrasts this with many developing nations that, having inherited little from colonial rule, must build institutions from scratch. This foundational difference is crucial when considering the export of governance models, emphasizing that the machinery of government is paramount.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Organizations

●Books

●Concepts

●People Referenced

Common Questions

Kaplan's 1994 essay predicted that the end of the Cold War would unleash simmering conflicts, exacerbated by environmental degradation, urbanization, and demographic shifts, leading to global fragmentation and disorder, contrary to the prevailing optimism of liberal humanism.