What is Brett Stevens' perspective on fighting antisemitism?

Brett Stevens argued that direct efforts to fight antisemitism have failed, suggesting it's a 'mind virus' without an inoculation. His proposed, though disagreed with, remedy was to double down on Jewish identity and let success be the rejoinder.

What is the speaker's stance on Jewish identity politics?

The speaker finds Jewish identity politics, especially a muscular version focused on centralizing Jewish learning, culture, and concerns, 'allergic' to. They prefer to fight for enlightenment values and the values of open societies.

Is criticism of Israel always antisemitic?

The speaker addresses the claim that much anti-semitism is valid critique of Israel. They argue that while there are legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government and settler movement, the core issue is the conflict with jihadism, not just criticism of Israeli policy.

What is the primary threat facing Israel and open societies?

The primary threat identified is 'jihadism,' described as a civilizational war against the values of open societies. This conflict is seen as existential for Israel and affects Muslims most historically, but also causes pain to others.

Are religious extremists on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict comparable?

No, the speaker emphasizes that religious extremists on both sides are not comparable in numbers, beliefs, cultural influence, or support. While Jewish religious fanatics are condemned, they are not on the same scale or of the same nature as jihadists.

What is the central point explaining the speaker's position on the conflict?

The speaker posits that if Palestinians had laid down their weapons and sought peace, peace could have been achieved. Conversely, if Israelis had done the same, genocide would have occurred, highlighting a fundamental asymmetry in the conflict's dynamics.

Key Moments

The Permission to Hate Jews Has Never Been This Open

Sam Harris

Science & Technology4 min read13 min video

Mar 12, 2026|42,799 views|1,704|1,458

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

Concerns rise over escalating antisemitism from the left and right, challenging enlightenment values.

Key Insights

Antisemitism is surging on both the left and the right, reaching unprecedented open levels.

Political figures on the right hesitate to issue clear condemnations of antisemitic figures, potentially for electoral gain.

There's a debate on how to combat antisemitism: through doubling down on Jewish identity or by defending enlightenment values.

Critiques of Israel are sometimes conflated with or used as a cover for antisemitism.

Israel's alliance with the US is framed as a shared fight against extremism and a stand for democracy in a volatile region.

Jihadism is identified as a fundamental threat to open societies, distinct from political or religious disagreements.

THE RESURGENCE OF ANTISEMITISM

The video expresses deep concern over the escalating and increasingly open antisemitism originating from both the left and the right. This trend is viewed as alarming because it undermines the foundational values of open societies and enlightenment principles. The discussion highlights that prominent figures and platforms are providing a space for white supremacy and antisemitism, a situation that was not anticipated to this degree.

RIGHT-WING COMPLICITY AND POLITICAL CALCULATIONS

A significant concern is the perceived hesitation of political figures, particularly within the Trump administration and its allies, to unequivocally condemn antisemitic rhetoric and individuals. This reluctance is interpreted as a strategic calculation, suggesting a need to appeal to the antisemitic and white supremacist vote. The authors find it puzzling that politicians would risk alienating independent voters by not issuing stronger condemnations.

STRATEGIES FOR CONFRONTING HATRED

The conversation explores differing approaches to countering antisemitism. One perspective, exemplified by a talk from Brett Stevens, suggests that fighting antisemitism directly has largely failed, proposing instead that Jewish resilience and success, alongside the success of Israel, serve as the best rejoinder. An alternative viewpoint advocates for a robust defense of enlightenment values and the pursuit of a post-identity politics future.

IDENTIFYING THE CORE THREAT OF JIHADISM

The discussion distinguishes between legitimate criticism of Israeli policy and antisemitism, framing the former as sometimes being used as a smokescreen for hate. Jihadism is presented as a primary threat to open societies, akin to the dangers posed by other forms of extremism and violence. This extremism is seen as a fundamental conflict with democratic values, not merely a byproduct of regional politics.

ISRAEL'S ROLE AND ALLIANCE WITH THE U.S.

Israel's strategic importance to the United States is framed in terms of shared interests against a common enemy: jihadism. The argument posits that Israel acts as a crucial ally and the sole democracy in a volatile region, fighting a 'civilizational war' that impacts American security. This perspective suggests that concerns about the Israeli lobby are secondary to recognizing Israel's frontline defense role.

THE DISTINCT NATURE OF RADICAL EXTREMISM

The conversation sharply differentiates between the nature and influence of religious extremists on different sides. It is argued that jihadist extremism is quantitatively and qualitatively different from any comparable extremist movements within Judaism. The overwhelming scale, deep cultural penetration, and widespread support for jihadism are contrasted with the limited influence and fringe nature of Jewish religious fanatics, who are still condemned.

THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF PEACE WITH JIHADIST GOVERNMENTS

A key point is made about the unviability of a two-state solution if the Palestinian state were to be governed by jihadists. The argument suggests that if Palestinians laid down their arms, peace could be achieved, whereas if Israelis were to do so, it could lead to their annihilation. This underlines the perceived existential threat and the fundamental nature of the conflict with certain forms of Palestinian leadership.

THE FALLACY OF MORAL PARITY

The presence of religious fanatics on both sides is acknowledged but framed as a distractor from the core issue. The argument refutes the idea of a 'moral parity' between jihadist extremism and any comparable Jewish extremism. While condemning all forms of extremism, the vast difference in scale, intent, and societal impact between jihadism and fringe radical elements within Judaism is emphasized.

THE NECESSITY OF DEFENDING ENLIGHTENMENT VALUES

Ultimately, the discussion returns to the critical need to defend enlightenment values and the principles of open societies. This defense is presented as a universal imperative, especially in the face of rising hatred and extremism. Not losing sight of this fundamental struggle against ideologies that are antithetical to freedom and tolerance is paramount.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Organizations

●Concepts

●People Referenced

Common Questions

Antisemitism is burgeoning on both the left and the right, with public figures failing to issue clear condemnations and actively creating space for white supremacy and antisemitism. This is alarming as it suggests a willingness to court such votes.

Topics

Foreign Policy Society & Philosophy Identity Politics Middle East Conflict Politics & Policy

Mentioned in this video

People

Donald Trump

His administration's actions and inactions regarding antisemitism are seen as alarming, suggesting a need to court antisemitic and white supremacist votes and failing to issue clear condemnations.

Brett Stevens

Gave a talk at the 92nd Street Y suggesting that fighting antisemitism explicitly has failed and the remedy is to double down on Jewish identity, a conclusion the speaker disagrees with.

Benjamin Netanyahu

Mentioned in the context of the conflict, suggesting that while he has flaws, he is not the core problem compared to the broader issue of jihadism and existential threats to Israel.

Mohammed bin Salman

Referred to as potentially a psychopath who has done awful things, but is noted for Saudi Arabia's positive step of sidelining religious fanatics and reining in jihadism.

David Duke

Mentioned as an example of the type of antisemitism the speaker experienced growing up, which felt confined to smaller corners.

Tucker Carlson

Cited as a gifted individual with a platform who is spreading antisemitic views, going beyond dog whistles and holding open the tent for white supremacy.

JD Vance

Cited as someone in power who, along with Trump, fails to issue clear condemnations of antisemitism and white supremacy, implying a need for such votes.

Candace Owens

Mentioned as a gifted individual with a platform who is spreading antisemitic views, going beyond dog whistles and holding open the tent for white supremacy.

Nick Fuentes

Mentioned as a gifted individual with a platform who is spreading antisemitic views, going beyond dog whistles and holding open the tent for white supremacy.

Locations

Gaza

Mentioned as the context for Hamas and the 'death cult' of jihadism.

Saudi Arabia

Mentioned as an example of an authoritarian context that is sidelining religious fanatics and pulling back reigns on jihadism, seen as a potentially promising sign.

Iran

Mentioned as an existential concern for Israel, highlighting the stakes of regional conflict.

Israel

Discussed as a crucial ally and the only democracy in its region, fighting a civilizational war. Its success and self-defense are seen as a rejoinder to antisemitism.

West Bank

The settler movement there is condemned as awful and provocative of present and future violence.

Organizations

Hamas

Identified as a jihadist group that prevents a two-state solution if democratically elected, and part of the 'death cult' being condemned.

92nd Street Y

The venue where Brett Stevens gave a talk discussing his views on fighting antisemitism.

Concepts

Islam

Discussed in the context of cultural change and religious extremism, with a distinction made between the mainstream and extremist elements.