Why is detecting asteroids challenging even with many telescopes?

Most asteroids are small and dark, so they reflect little light and can be lost in the glare of the Sun. Also, long observation baselines are needed to predict future positions, and chaos in orbital dynamics limits how far we can accurately forecast.

What is the Behringer crater and why does it matter?

Behringer crater is a site in Arizona named after Daniel Behringer, who argued it was formed by a meteorite impact. The story illustrates how high-speed impacts vaporize the projectile and release enormous energy.

Can we deflect or destroy an asteroid headed for Earth?

The video explains there is no proven, reliable method to deflect a kilometer-sized asteroid with current technology. Bombs, rockets, or lasers all have significant uncertainties and could fail or just create a rubble pile that still impacts Earth.

What are the odds of a large asteroid hitting Earth in our lifetime?

A 10-kilometer asteroid impact is estimated at about once every 100 million years, giving a per-year risk of about 1 in 100 million. In practical terms, the chance during a single lifetime is effectively negligible due to the large timescale.

What steps should we take to prepare for asteroid threats?

First, focus on detecting and tracking asteroids with telescopes and potentially space-based assets to know what could hit. Then, if a dangerous object is found, prioritize planning and research on mitigation rather than awaiting a perfect solution.

These are the asteroids to worry about

Veritasium

Education6 min read21 min video

Nov 30, 2020|80,502,054 views|658,150|31,547

veritasium science physics

Save to Pod

Key Moments

On this page

TL;DR

Asteroids threaten Earth; detection gaps, small-city risks, and limited deflection options.

Key Insights

Small asteroids can cause devastating damage: Chelyabinsk shows a 20 m object can injure thousands and damage cities.

Detection is biased and incomplete: most NEAs are found opposite the Sun; objects coming from the Sun remain hidden.

Long-term prediction is limited by chaos: we can reliably forecast only about 100 years into the future for orbits.

Mid-sized threats matter most for civilization: 1–2 km asteroids could devastate a country; 10 km events are far rarer but catastrophic.

Deflection options are not yet viable: bombs, rockets, lasers, or wrapping a body in foil lack proven effectiveness for large, fast-rotating asteroids.

The practical path is better detection and targeted research: build surveys (including space-based) and focus resources on any object flagged as dangerous.

ORIGINS AND TYPES OF ASTEROIDS

Asteroids are the leftover debris from the solar system’s formation 4.5 billion years ago. Some are loose rubble piles of rock and dust, others are metallic fragments that formed the cores of early protoplanets and later shattered apart. Most stay in the main belt between Mars and Jupiter, but some wander inward toward Earth as near‑Earth objects. This mix of rocky rubble and iron‑nickel cores means asteroids vary widely in strength, density, and how they break apart on impact. Some behave like fragile gravel, others resemble small planets when they hit.

CHELYABINSK AND DUENDE: SMALL OBJECTS, BIG CONSEQUENCES

Chelyabinsk demonstrated the danger of a relatively small object. A roughly 20‑meter body exploded about 30 kilometers up, producing a flash brighter than the Sun and a shockwave that shattered thousands of windows and injured about 1,500 people. Coincidentally, the same day a larger body named Duende passed within roughly 27,000 kilometers, highlighting how close encounters can slip by unseen even as we track other objects. The juxtaposition underscores how a large surprise can occur while a predicted near‑miss draws attention elsewhere.

UNSEEN THREATS: DETECTION CHALLENGES AND THE OPPOSITION EFFECT

Detecting asteroids before impact is hard because most are small, dark, and far away. Observers take sequences of images to spot a moving dot against stars, but many asteroids reflect only a tiny fraction of sunlight. The opposition effect means detections cluster when asteroids are opposite the Sun in our sky; objects coming from the Sun’s direction remain invisible. There are about a million asteroids in total, with roughly 24,000 near‑Earth objects requiring careful watching, yet many still remain hidden until it’s too late.

NEAR-EARTH OBJECTS: NUMBERS, UNKNOWNs, AND PREDICTION LIMITS

Near‑Earth objects are the subset whose paths bring them close to Earth. We’ve cataloged about 24,000 of them, but only a fraction pose real danger. Even with an identified orbit, predicting exact futures requires years of data because planetary gravity perturbs trajectories. In practice, reliable long‑term forecasts are limited to roughly a century; beyond that, chaotic dynamics erode confidence. This means we may know a dangerous object exists without being able to predict precisely when or where it will strike far into the future.

ENERGY, BEHRINGER, AND THE DINOSAURS: WHY IMPACTS MATTER

Behringer crater shows how impacts unfold: a 50‑meter asteroid vaporizes on impact, releasing energy far greater than its mass implies and blasting a crater. By contrast, a 10‑kilometer asteroid that struck 65 million years ago unleashed global fires and climate shifts, extinguishing the dinosaurs. Large events eject debris that circles the globe, turning daylight skies into meteor showers and driving climate change. These dynamics—local destruction for small bodies, planet‑wide consequences for giant ones—illustrate why asteroid threats are taken seriously.

RISK BY SIZE: WHAT COULD HAPPEN IN YOUR LIFETIME

Smaller bodies are far more common than colossal ones. A 10‑kilometer impact is exceedingly rare in a human lifetime, but 1–2 kilometer objects could devastate a country. The event of a world‑ending hit in the next 100 million years carries a tiny daily probability; over a lifetime, the risk appears negligible, especially given no known 10‑kilometer Earth‑crossing threats in the near term. Yet hundreds of meters remain a realistic hazard, capable of destroying cities and altering regional futures.

DEFLECTION AND MITIGATION: WHY NOTHING IS READY RIGHT NOW

Even when we spot a dangerous asteroid, there is no guaranteed way to stop it. Bombs might fracture the body into harmful debris; pushing with rockets or ablating the surface with lasers is impractical for fast, rotating bodies with current tech. Wrapping in foil or other tricks remains speculative and logistics‑heavy. In short, there is no proven, scalable method to deflect a kilometer‑scale asteroid today, and the possibilities for a safe, proven solution are not yet within reach.

EVACUATION CHALLENGES: SHOULD WE RUN WHEN DANGER ARRIVES

Evacuating a city is not a simple fix. Even with warning, traffic crises, blocked freeways, and overwhelmed logistics would hinder millions from leaving quickly. Essential services, supply lines, and rescue operations would be strained or fail under the weight of sudden mass movement. The practical answer is to improve detection and analysis first, so we know where (and when) any potential impact would occur, then weigh proportionate responses. Evacuation alone is unlikely to be a reliable shield against asteroid impacts.

A PRACTICAL PATH FOR DEFENSE: SURVEILLANCE FIRST

The most practical response is to focus on discovery: build more telescopes, especially space‑based ones, to find objects before they become threats. With richer data, we refine orbits, cut uncertainties, and determine whether a collision is plausible. If a genuinely dangerous object is identified, we can channel resources into focused deflection research. Detection thus becomes the non‑negotiable first step, enabling informed decisions about any further action as our capabilities evolve.

THE BIGGER PICTURE: WHY ASTEROIDS ARE JUST ONE THREAT AMONG GLOBAL CATASTROPHES

Some researchers compare asteroid risk to a broader map of global catastrophes, reminding us that civilization faces many low‑probability, high‑impact threats. A robust, informed approach requires sustained science investment, transparent communication, and public education. By treating asteroid risk as one data point in a broader risk landscape, we can maintain balanced policies—prioritizing long‑term monitoring and research without succumbing to fear or paralysis.

SPONSORSHIP NOTE: KIWI CO

This episode includes a sponsorship segment for KiwiCo, which offers hands‑on projects and toys designed to spark curiosity in kids. The host describes monthly crates that promote learning through making, with a 50% off offer for the first month using a promo code. The sponsor message is part of supporting educational content while helping families engage children in STEM activities and creative exploration.

CONCLUSION: A CLEAR, ACTIONABLE AGENDA FOR THE FUTURE

The clearest path forward is to invest in detection infrastructure, especially space‑based surveys, so we can spot potentially dangerous objects early. Better tracking enables prioritizing research into feasible deflection concepts and planning concrete responses if needed. Evacuation remains unreliable, so prevention through knowledge is the priority. Scientists must continue mapping the asteroid population, validating models, and communicating risks clearly, ensuring society can respond calmly and effectively when warnings arrive rather than reacting with panic.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Tools & Products

●People Referenced

Asteroid risk quick reference

Practical takeaways from this episode

Do This

Support asteroid surveys and space telescopes to improve detection of near-Earth objects.

Prioritize follow-up observations to refine orbits and forecast potential impacts.

Focus research on feasible planetary defense concepts for the most dangerous objects.

Avoid This

Do not rely on evacuation as a guaranteed safeguard.

Do not assume all asteroids are too small to cause damage; even 100-meter bodies can devastate a city depending on impact.

Common Questions

A meteor exploded about 30 kilometers above Chelyabinsk, Russia, creating a bright flash and a silent sky that was followed by a powerful shockwave. The blast shattered windows and injured about 1,500 people.