What are the ethical considerations of vaccine hesitancy?

Harris views vaccine hesitancy, when not based on compelling medical reasons, as a failed commitment to the common good. He likens it to not wearing a seatbelt, arguing that the decision impacts not only the individual but also society through increased healthcare costs and the potential to prolong the pandemic and breed new variants.

How does Sam Harris explain the breakdown of trust in institutions among vaccine hesitant individuals?

Referencing Constantine Kisin's thread, Harris acknowledges that events like Brexit, the Trump election, and perceived institutional capitulations to 'woke-ism' have eroded trust. However, he argues this doesn't excuse a complete breakdown of trust, especially when it leads to rejecting effective public health measures like vaccination.

What is Sam Harris's view on the evidence for COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness?

Harris states that 'we know these vaccines work and we know they are safe enough at this point,' especially when compared to the risks of contracting COVID-19 without vaccination. He believes the differential outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals who contract COVID-19 are no longer debatable.

How does Sam Harris compare concerns about election fraud to vaccine hesitancy?

Harris acknowledges that concerns about election integrity are rational and worth guarding against, but distinguishes this from the 'utterly delusional claim that the 2020 election was stolen.' He suggests that the 'just asking questions' routine becomes problematic when it amplifies baseless claims or in bad faith, unlike legitimate concerns about institutional failures.

What does Sam Harris mean by 'pornography of doubt' regarding distrust in authority?

Harris uses this phrase to describe the zealous and often irrational distrust of institutional authority, comparing it to conspiracy theories like 9/11 thermite allegations. He feels this reflexive distrust is infatuating for some, leading to poor quality thinking and hindering progress, much like religious fundamentalism.

What is the biggest challenge in repairing societal trust in institutions?

Harris describes the challenge as needing to 'repair an airplane as it's flying,' meaning improving and trusting institutions while recognizing their failures. He believes navigating public health emergencies requires functioning institutions like the CDC and FDA, not relying solely on podcasts or newsletters.

Key Moments

Ask Me Anything #17

Sam Harris

Science & Technology4 min read25 min video

Aug 8, 2021|74,884 views|2,104|3,175

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

Sam Harris debunks vaccine hesitancy, critiques media, and discusses identity politics.

Key Insights

The podcast begins with an addendum concerning the blowback from a previous episode on vaccine hesitancy, with Harris acknowledging criticisms about not being non-judgmental enough.

Harris argues against the "just asking questions" approach to complex scientific and public health issues during a crisis, stating it can be misleading and irresponsible.

He posits that the fear of needles and the perception of vaccination as an "act of commission" contribute to hesitancy, contrasting it with the perceived ease of an "act of omission."

Journalism and institutions have failed, leading to a breakdown in trust; however, Harris believes this doesn't necessitate a total erosion of trust but a repair and critical engagement.

The discussion touches on identity politics, with a listener questioning how to inoculate biracial children against its pervasive influence in educational settings.

Harris criticizes the "pornography of doubt" and the identity politics surrounding vaccine hesitancy and election integrity claims, likening it to fringe conspiracy theories.

ADDRESSING THE VACCINE HESITANCY DEBATE

Sam Harris opens the AMA by addressing the significant backlash from his previous podcast on vaccine hesitancy. He acknowledges that some criticism, particularly regarding the approach to the vaccine-hesitant, was valid, admitting he and his guest perhaps didn't try hard enough to be non-judgmental. However, he refutes the idea that one must "walk on eggshells" to reach this audience, noting the polarized responses: those already inclined to agree loved the episode, while those skeptical felt Harris and his guest were clueless.

THE DANGERS OF PUBLICLY 'JUST ASKING QUESTIONS'

Harris strongly criticizes the "just asking questions" routine, exemplified by figures like Brett Weinstein. He argues that while some anomalies or points might seem unaddressed in real-time, such discussions in public, especially during a health crisis, can be misleading and irresponsible. This approach can foster uncertainty, leading even intelligent people to default to inaction, such as not getting vaccinated, which has serious public health consequences.

PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS IN VACCINE HESITANCY

The physical act of vaccination, involving a needle, is highlighted as a significant psychological barrier, perceived as an "act of commission" with greater ethical weight than an "act of omission" (i.e., not getting vaccinated). Harris draws parallels to not wearing seatbelts, noting that individual choices have societal costs. He argues that vaccine hesitancy, in the face of overwhelming data on vaccine safety and efficacy, represents a failed commitment to the common good, prolonging the pandemic and potentially allowing for more dangerous variants.

INSTITUTIONAL FAILURES AND THE EROSION OF TRUST

The podcast delves into a broader critique of institutional failures, particularly in media and politics, which have eroded public trust. Harris agrees with the assessment that recent years have seen numerous insults to reason and instances of public hypocrisy, contributing to skepticism. However, he differentiates between acknowledging institutional failings and succumbing to a complete breakdown of trust, emphasizing the need to repair rather than abandon institutions, especially during crises.

IDENTITY POLITICS AND THE CHALLENGE FOR BIRACIAL CHILDREN

A listener poses a question about how to inoculate biracial children against the identity politics they will inevitably encounter in schools and universities. This highlights a significant societal concern regarding how concepts of race and identity are framed and taught, and the potential impact on children navigating multiple racial backgrounds within such frameworks.

THE CORROSIVE NATURE OF BAD FAITH SKEPTICISM

Harris likens the current climate of reflexive distrust and the "just asking questions" approach to fringe conspiracy theories like 9/11 revisionism or religious fundamentalism. He critiques the "pornography of doubt," where contrarianism becomes an identity. He argues that this approach is often in bad faith or oblivious to its corrosive effects, particularly when applied to issues with clear scientific consensus and significant public health implications, such as vaccines or election integrity.

RATIONAL BELIEF VS. MERELY CONTRARIANISM

The podcast emphasizes the importance of forming beliefs based on available evidence and rational assessment, rather than succumbing to conspiratorial thinking or a performative skepticism. Harris contrasts legitimate concerns about, for example, election integrity, which warrant vigilance, with delusional claims of widespread fraud. Similarly, while acknowledging the theoretical possibility of unforeseen long-term vaccine side effects, he stresses that current evidence makes vaccination the overwhelmingly rational choice.

THE ETHICAL OBLIGATION TO PROMOTE GLOBAL VACCINATION

Harris asserts that promoting global vaccination is an ethical obligation, especially considering the potential emergence of deadlier variants. He argues that in such a scenario, refusing effective vaccines would be unthinkable. The current situation, he suggests, reveals a dangerous trend where skepticism and contrarianism have become quasi-religious phenomena, leading to dangerously poor decision-making that jeopardizes public health and societal well-being.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Supplements

●Organizations

●Drugs & Medications

●People Referenced

Common Questions

Sam Harris criticizes Brett Weinstein's 'just asking questions' approach for being irresponsible during a public health crisis. He argues that while questioning is important, repeatedly platforming unsubstantiated fears about vaccines in public can be misleading and corrosive to public trust, leading to unnecessary disease and death by discouraging vaccination despite evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy.

Topics

Critical Thinking Health & Longevity Science & Mathematics Society & Philosophy Pandemic Response Identity Politics Public Health Institutional Trust Vaccine Hesitancy

Mentioned in this video

People

Sam Harris

Host of the Making Sense podcast, discussing vaccine hesitancy and broader societal issues.

Constantine Kisin

Author of a Twitter thread that Brett Weinstein highlighted as an explanation for vaccine hesitancy, focusing on the breakdown of trust in institutions.

Tucker Carlson

Mentioned as a media figure whose platform has provided views on COVID-19 vaccines that Harris finds misinformed.

Eric Topol

Guest on a previous episode of the Making Sense Podcast discussing vaccines, whose points Sam Harris is reflecting on.

Alexandros Morenos

Author of a Twitter thread that dissected Sam Harris's podcast with Eric Topol, which Brett Weinstein recommended.

Supplements

Ivermectin

A drug mentioned as a potential prophylactic for COVID-19, discussed in the context of alternative treatments that are not widely available or proven.

Books

Who

World Health Organization, mentioned as a vital institution for navigating global public health emergencies.

Organizations

FDA

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, mentioned as a necessary institution for public health during a pandemic.

CDC

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, mentioned as a crucial public health institution that needs to be functioning effectively during a pandemic.

Drugs & Medications

Steroids

Incorrectly identified as 'Thermite' in the transcript, this section refers to a conspiracy theory about the 9/11 attacks and the melting point of steel.

Media

Making Sense Podcast

The podcast hosted by Sam Harris, where this 'Ask Me Anything' episode is featured. The discussion revolves around vaccine hesitancy and institutional trust.