Key Moments
Q&A: Dreamer Bulks, Concurrent Training, Recovery Modalities, and Valuing Research (Episode 17)
Key Moments
Bulking rates, hypertrophy rep ranges, recovery, and valuing research are discussed.
Key Insights
Slow weight gain (0.25-0.5% of body weight per week) with a 10-20% caloric surplus is generally optimal for maximizing lean mass gain while minimizing fat.
While higher rep ranges (20-30) can yield similar hypertrophy to lower ranges (8-12) with equal volume, the 5-12 rep range is often preferred for practicality and reduced 'suck factor'.
Sleep hygiene is crucial for training; recommendations include regular routines, avoiding caffeine/alcohol before bed, dark/quiet rooms, and limiting blue light exposure.
Soreness is not a reliable indicator of training effectiveness; progress tracking (weight lifted, reps, sets) is the best method to gauge training intensity.
Concurrent training (cardio and lifting) can lead to interference effects, particularly impacting power output. Minimizing interference involves careful management of volume, intensity, and timing, with lower body cardio posing a larger risk.
Post-workout massage aids recovery, while static stretching's utility is context-dependent, with light stretching between sets potentially boosting hypertrophy and prolonged stretching improving range of motion.
OPTIMAL RATES OF WEIGHT GAIN DURING BULKING
The optimal rate of weight gain during a bulk involves balancing lean mass acquisition with fat accumulation. Generally, a slow rate of weight gain, aiming for 0.25% to 0.5% of body weight per week, is recommended. This typically requires a caloric intake 10-20% above maintenance. While faster gains are possible, they increase the likelihood of excessive fat gain, making subsequent cutting phases more difficult. Experienced individuals or those nearing their genetic potential may opt for even slower rates. The 'dreamer bulk' approach, characterized by excessive calorie intake and rapid weight gain, is often reminisced about but typically leads to significant fat gain and a harder subsequent cut.
REP RANGES AND HYPERTROPHY FOR MUSCLE GROWTH
For hypertrophy, equal training volume across different rep ranges (e.g., 3 sets of 8-12 reps vs. 3 sets of 20-30 reps) can lead to similar muscle growth. However, practical considerations often favor the 5-12 rep range due to reduced discomfort and fatigue, making adherence easier. Higher rep ranges can be beneficial for specific exercises, like isolation movements for smaller muscle groups, where they may provide a greater pump and burn. The choice of rep range should also consider the exercise type, with compound lifts potentially being more fatiguing at higher repetitions, and individual joint health considerations influencing preferences.
THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPROVING SLEEP QUALITY
Adequate sleep is a cornerstone of effective training and recovery. Key strategies for improving sleep include establishing a regular bedtime routine, avoiding stimulants like caffeine and alcohol close to sleep, and creating a dark, quiet, and cool sleep environment. Getting bright natural light exposure in the morning can help regulate the circadian rhythm, while minimizing blue light exposure in the evening is crucial. The advice to 'not go to bed until you're tired' is generally good, but for some, forcing a consistent bedtime may be more effective. Addressing sleep disturbances, such as snoring or poor breathing, and consulting a physician for conditions like sleep apnea, are also important steps.
ASSESSING TRAINING INTENSITY BEYOND SORENESS
Soreness is not a reliable indicator of a productive training session; long-term progress tracking is a more effective measure. Instead of relying on how one feels in the hours or days following a workout, focus on objective performance metrics. This includes monitoring increases in weight lifted, repetitions completed, or overall training volume over time. A subjective feeling of being able to perform another similar workout the next day, without feeling completely depleted, is generally a good target. Persistent fatigue coupled with a lack of progress may indicate overtraining, while consistent progress suggests adequate training intensity.
NAVIGATING THE INTERFERENCE EFFECT IN CONCURRENT TRAINING
Concurrent training, combining aerobic exercise with resistance training, can lead to an 'interference effect,' where the adaptations from one modality may blunt the adaptations from the other, particularly impacting power output. To minimize this, manage the volume and intensity of both training types carefully. Limiting vigorous cardio sessions to two or three per week, with perhaps one or two being high-intensity interval training (HIIT), is often recommended. Separating cardio and resistance training sessions by several hours, or ideally into different days, is beneficial. Prioritizing resistance training first in a combined session can also help preserve strength and hypertrophy gains.
RECOVERY MODALITIES: MASSAGE, STRETCHING, AND THEIR UTILITY
Among recovery modalities, post-workout massage has shown significant benefits for both objective performance recovery and subjective soreness reduction. Stretching's utility is more nuanced; intense static stretching immediately before exercise can impair performance and potentially reduce hypertrophy. However, light stretching between sets may enhance hypertrophy, and prolonged stretching interventions away from training sessions can improve range of motion and tissue extensibility, potentially aiding strength. The research also suggests that for those engaging in concurrent training, avoiding training to muscular failure might mitigate interference effects and enhance hypertrophy.
VALUING RESEARCH AMIDST IMPERFECT LITERATURE
Despite the presence of low-quality or even fraudulent research, scientific literature remains the best tool for objective decision-making in fitness. The limited engagement with primary research by most individuals, combined with the self-correcting nature of science and the efforts of diligent researchers and science communicators, helps to filter out poor information. Developing critical appraisal skills, checking interpretations against those of trusted sources, and understanding that scientific progress is iterative and imperfect are key. While science isn't infallible, discarding it entirely leaves one with less reliable methods for understanding complex topics.
Mentioned in This Episode
●Products
●Software & Apps
●Companies
●Organizations
●Studies Cited
●People Referenced
Sleep Hygiene for Training Recovery
Practical takeaways from this episode
Do This
Avoid This
Common Questions
For most individuals, particularly those with some training experience, aiming to gain about 0.25% to 0.5% of body weight per week is recommended. This can generally be achieved by consuming 10% to 20% above your maintenance calorie level. Beginners might be able to gain slightly faster, while very experienced lifters might benefit from a slower rate to minimize fat gain.
Topics
Mentioned in this video
A bench specialist who trained at Westside Barbell and held multiple multi-ply bench records across different weight classes. Known for a legendary high-calorie diet for rapid weight gain.
Host of a podcast where a question about valuing research despite its flaws was posed, which is discussed in the episode.
An American astrophysicist, author, and science communicator, used as an example of someone who might avoid discussing the 'dirty' side of science to maintain public confidence.
An American science communicator and television presenter, cited as an example of someone who might avoid openly critiquing scientific flaws to maintain public trust in science.
Mentioned as a potential source for the JM Blakely diet story, known in the strength training community.
A British statesman, army officer, and writer, whose quote about democracy being the 'least bad system' is paralleled to the value of scientific research despite its shortcomings.
A study that found more hypertrophy when doing concurrent training versus resistance training alone, where the majority of resistance training was not done to failure.
Cited as authors of two concurrent training studies with isokinetic resistance training, making it hard to apply findings to normal isotonic training.
A study that found more hypertrophy with concurrent training versus resistance training alone, with 14 out of 21 weeks of training not done to failure.
A recently published paper (last month at time of recording) that looked at training to failure versus not to failure in concurrent training, finding significantly larger quad hypertrophy in the non-failure group.
A 2019 open-access review paper discussing the importance of caloric surplus for muscle gain and offseason guidelines, supporting a 0.25-0.5% body weight gain per week.
A review paper from 2019 offering guidelines on caloric surplus for muscle gain and offseason strategies for physique competitors.
More from Stronger By Science
View all 175 summaries
1 minHow to avoid poor sleep due to caffeine use
1 minAre free-weight exercises really king?
1 minWhich exercises build the most muscle?
1 minDoes Being Overweight Really Make You Unhealthier?
Found this useful? Build your knowledge library
Get AI-powered summaries of any YouTube video, podcast, or article in seconds. Save them to your personal pods and access them anytime.
Try Summify free