Key Moments
The Jobs AI Won’t Take. "A Lot Of Jobs We Have Now Will Go Away BUT..." | Ben Horowitz
Key Moments
AI won't make humans obsolete, but a lack of blockchain infrastructure could lead to societal collapse if we can't distinguish real from fake or secure our data.
Key Insights
AI is best understood as 'models' of the world, directed by humans, not sentient beings with free will.
Historically, technological revolutions eliminate jobs (e.g., agriculture in 1750, 97% disappeared), but new roles emerge, ultimately improving quality of life.
AI's current constraint is its reliance on human-derived 'axioms' and language; it does not yet directly observe or discover new principles of the universe.
The US has a decentralized advantage in AI development over China's top-down approach, despite China's potential data and math strengths.
A lack of robust blockchain infrastructure (public key infrastructure, wallets, zero-knowledge proofs) is a significant risk for AI integration, potentially leading to loss of privacy and security.
Government payments and services could be dramatically improved in transparency and efficiency by moving onto a blockchain-based system.
Understanding AI: Models, Not Minds
Ben Horowitz clarifies that AI, or 'artificial intelligence,' is a misnomer. The technology is better described as 'models' that humans build to understand and predict the world. Unlike human intelligence, these AI models lack free will, consciousness, or desires. They are tools directed by humans, functioning as servants rather than independent entities. This distinction is crucial in understanding AI's capabilities and its relationship with humanity, emphasizing that current AI is a sophisticated tool, not a nascent life form.
Historical parallels of technological disruption
History provides a roadmap for understanding the impact of AI on the job market. In 1750, over 90% of jobs were agricultural. Innovations like the plow led to the elimination of 97% of these roles. However, this shift ultimately led to a better quality of life for most people, even though it was met with resistance (the Luddites fought against technological advancements). Horowitz suggests that while many current jobs will disappear due to AI, humans are adept at creating new roles and pursuing new endeavors, much like how space exploration is now a potential career path.
The limits of current AI; the human role in discovery
A key argument is that current AI, including large language models, is limited by the human knowledge and language it's trained on. AI learns our structure, our interpretation of the universe, and our language––which is not an objective representation of reality. It refines and derives from our existing knowledge base but does not directly observe the world or discover new universal principles on its own. Humans retain a critical role in exploring, interpreting, and discovering new aspects of reality. This distinction is important because it suggests that while AI can process vast amounts of information and generate predictions, humans are still essential for true innovation and understanding. The current AI models are essentially trained on 'our rendition of the universe,' not the universe itself.
US vs. China in AI: Decentralization vs. Centralization
The AI race with China has multiple dimensions. While China, a top-down society, can rapidly integrate AI into its military and government, the US benefits from its 'wild, messy' decentralized structure, allowing more smart people to participate. Although China may have advantages in data and math with a large population, the US's strength lies in fostering innovation across a broad ecosystem, including startups and tools like 'cursor' which facilitate development. Horowitz argues that US leads in AI models are currently shallow, and its economic strength comes from a vibrant AI ecosystem, which could be stifled by overly restrictive regulation.
The existential risk: Blockchain as a necessary safeguard
Horowitz presents a controversial view: without robust blockchain technology, AI poses a significant risk to society. He outlines several potential problems: the inability to distinguish humans from AI (deepfakes), the erosion of truth and reality, widespread data breaches making personal information insecure, and the need for AI agents to transact financially. These issues, he argues, are best solved by blockchain's ability to provide public key infrastructure, secure digital identities (via wallets and zero-knowledge proofs), and create a trusted system for transactions. Without this, society could face a breakdown in trust and security, leading to what he calls a 'cyberpunk' dystopia.
The promise of blockchain for governance and economy
Blockchain technology can revolutionize governance and the economy. Horowitz advocates for electronic money, specifically stablecoins backed by US dollars, to facilitate transactions between automated agreements and entities, addressing the massive energy demands of AI. He explains that stablecoins could increase demand for dollars and improve efficiency. The 'Market Structure Bill' (FIT 21) is also seen as crucial for defining tokens and preventing fraud by establishing clear rules. Furthermore, he suggests that putting government payments on the blockchain would increase transparency, reduce waste and fraud (citing $400 billion lost during COVID stimulus efforts), and potentially strengthen democracy by ensuring direct and verifiable distribution of funds and services.
Historical figures as inspiration for innovation
Two historical figures, Isaac Newton and Toussaint Louverture, are highlighted for their strategic thinking and problem-solving abilities, offering parallels to modern innovation. Isaac Newton, despite being a theoretical physicist, successfully reorganized the Bank of England's mint, tackled counterfeiting, and became a prosecutor, demonstrating a unique ability to apply intellect to practical, complex systems. Toussaint Louverture, a former slave, led the only successful slave revolt in history, using innovative communication methods (songs and drums) and hybrid military strategies to defeat powerful European armies. Both figures exemplify the principle of using available tools creatively and strategically to overcome seemingly insurmountable challenges, a mindset crucial for navigating the AI and blockchain revolutions.
AI as a creative canvas and the evolving role of humans
AI is viewed not as a replacement for human creativity but as a new 'creative canvas.' While AI can automate mundane tasks like data collection or initial coding, it frees humans to focus on higher-level strategic thinking, problem-solving, and innovation. For example, venture capital firms can use AI to sift through data for investments, allowing investors to spend more time on strategic decision-making. Similarly, in entertainment, AI can handle repetitive editing, allowing creatives to envision entirely new forms of content. The key is to adapt, learn to leverage these tools, and shift creative energy towards areas where human insight and strategic direction are paramount.
Mentioned in This Episode
●Software & Apps
●Companies
●Organizations
●Books
●Concepts
●People Referenced
Navigating the AI Revolution: Dos and Don'ts
Practical takeaways from this episode
Do This
Avoid This
Common Questions
While AI will undoubtedly eliminate many current jobs, history shows that technological advancements also create new roles. Humans are adaptable and tend to find new pursuits. The key is to stay creative and focus on developing skills that complement AI.
Topics
Mentioned in this video
Co-founder of OpenAI, has also expressed concerns about AI's impact while actively developing the technology.
A key leader of the Haitian Revolution, highlighted as a master strategist who successfully led a slave revolt to establish an independent state.
Mega investor and pioneer in Silicon Valley, influential in shaping AI's direction and advocating against government overreach.
Historical figure whose efforts to create GE are contrasted with the current accessibility of tools for individual impact, especially with AI.
Co-investor with Horowitz in AI, discussed in the context of predicting the future and challenging established norms.
Expressed deep concerns about AI's potential to make humans obsolete, likening AI development to summoning a demon, yet is actively building AI.
Met with regarding the Biden administration's AI policy.
Met with regarding the Biden administration's AI policy.
Described as running domestic policy under the Biden administration, with a push to outlaw new financial technologies and kick people out of the banking system.
A historical figure compared to Elon Musk for his ability to tackle complex problems, including leading the Mint to combat counterfeiting.
Mentioned as someone who negatively impacted the reputation of the crypto industry.
A Swedish company that builds apps using AI, mentioned as an example of emerging tools in the AI space.
The website for Andreessen Horowitz, where more information can be found.
An AI model noted for its capability with real-time data due to its connection with Twitter.
An AI-powered code editor that allows users to select different AI models for their tasks, viewed as crucial for application development, especially for government needs.
A company offering a product related to building applications, mentioned in the context of AI development tools.
Stated to be very good at reasoning, and part of the discussion on AI development and investment strategy.
Noted for being particularly good at code generation within the landscape of AI models.
An AI model mentioned for its writing capabilities, potentially due to training on a larger dataset than US models.
A project aiming for broad adoption by providing proof of humanity, with significant usage in Buenos Aires and potential integration into social platforms.
A compliant public company in the crypto space that sought feedback but was overlooked by regulators focused on outlawing the industry.
Accused of attempting to limit and control AI, and later criticized for being hostile towards tech, fintech, and crypto.
A group that historically fought against new inventions like the plow during the Industrial Revolution, serving as a parallel to resistance against AI.
A failed cryptocurrency exchange, mentioned in the context of regulatory failure and scams.
More from Tom Bilyeu
View all 57 summaries
37 minAmerica's Inequality Score Is 0.01 Away From The Number That Caused The Gilded Age To Collapse
139 minAI Just Compressed 160 Years of Aging Research — Here's What They Found | Dr. David Sinclair
126 minThe Strait Of Hormuz Is Closed and Are We On The Brink Of Revolution?
129 minThe Real Reason Trump Turned on Tucker, Megyn Kelly, and Alex Jones w/ Special Guest Michael Malice
Found this useful? Build your knowledge library
Get AI-powered summaries of any YouTube video, podcast, or article in seconds. Save them to your personal pods and access them anytime.
Get Started Free