What is the primary argument for supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression?

The moral case involves defending a victimized democracy against an authoritarian bully. The national interest case is to demonstrate that democracies can be defended, deterring future aggression from autocrats like Putin and Xi, and preventing a global crisis akin to the 1930s.

What was Bret Stephens's experience during his trip to Ukraine?

Stephens described taking a long train journey due to lack of flights, witnessing Kyiv's resilience with citizens living life as normally as possible while fighting the war, and experiencing air raid alerts. He noted the Ukrainians' strong determination to win and reclaim all their territory.

Why have trust in experts and institutions declined, and what are the consequences?

Trust has declined because experts and institutions often failed to acknowledge their mistakes, offered inadequate solutions with arrogance, and were perceived as out of touch, particularly during events like the COVID-19 pandemic. This leads to widespread distrust and people relying on their own, often unreliable, research.

What are the trade-offs involved in public policy decisions, as seen during COVID-19?

Public health is a crucial interest, but not the sole one. For example, closing schools caused significant damage to children's development. Decisions require balancing competing goods, like public health with education and social well-being, rather than prioritizing one to the exclusion of all others.

How has celebrity-driven anti-establishment sentiment impacted politics?

Figures like RFK Jr. and Alex Jones capitalize on distrust in institutions, promoting skepticism towards established narratives and experts. This is amplified by social media algorithms that boost divisive content, leading people to fringe theories and making open debate seem like the only path to truth, despite the risks of boosting misinformation.

What is the argument against de-platforming or censoring controversial figures?

Attempting to suppress voices, even those spreading misinformation like Alex Jones, can inadvertently give them a 'patina of victimization' and elevate their profile. It can also hinder the process of understanding truth by removing falsehoods from the 'ecology of truth' where they are needed for contrast.

What journalistic considerations surrounded the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election?

The timing of the story, just 10 days before the election, raised concerns about it being an 'October surprise' potentially influenced by Russian disinformation, similar to 2016 events. Some argued it was journalistically prudent to delay deep investigation until after the election to avoid appearing to tip the scales.

What is the opposing view on handling sensitive political stories before an election?

The counter-argument is that journalists have a duty to report legitimate stories when they have reason to believe they are true, regardless of timing or political implications. Withholding such stories, or allowing self-censorship based on perceived election tipping, compromises media credibility and alienates the public.

Do claims that the 2020 election was stolen due to the Hunter Biden laptop story hold merit?

Some prominent Republicans, like Vivek Ramaswamy, argue the election was influenced by the media's handling of the Hunter Biden laptop story. However, the podcast discussion suggests that even if the laptop contained compromising information, it's unlikely to have altered the outcome for many voters prioritizing concerns about Trump's threat to democracy.

Key Moments

What Happened to the Republican Party?: A Conversation with Bret Stephens (Episode #329)

Sam Harris

Science & Technology5 min read61 min video

Aug 13, 2023|179,017 views|3,015|1,770

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

On this page

TL;DR

Bret Stephens discusses the modern Republican Party's shift towards isolationism, praises Ukraine's resilience, and critiques elite failures.

Key Insights

The Republican Party has undergone a significant ideological shift, moving from internationalism to a form of truculent nationalism, influenced by figures like Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump.

Support for Ukraine is presented as a moral imperative and a crucial national interest for the U.S., serving to deter future aggression by authoritarians like Putin and Xi.

The war in Ukraine has exposed the limitations of expert predictions and the broader failure of elites to acknowledge their missteps, leading to widespread public distrust.

Public health officials during the COVID-19 pandemic are criticized for overstepping their mandate and failing to acknowledge competing public interests, causing long-term damage.

The debate around misinformation and free speech highlights a complex challenge, where censorship can inadvertently amplify voices and distrust in institutions is rampant.

The handling of the Hunter Biden laptop story by the media raised questions about journalistic ethics, the timing of reporting, and the potential for perceived bias impacting public trust.

THE IDEOLOGICAL REORIENTATION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Bret Stephens notes a significant transformation within the Republican Party, moving from its post-WWII internationalist stance to a more isolationist and nationalistic position. This shift, particularly evident since Donald Trump's ascendancy, has led to an unexpected admiration for figures like Vladimir Putin among some factions. Stephens contrasts this with the historical role of the Republican party and critiques the embrace of a 'truculent nationalism' that finds common ground with authoritarian strongman tactics, exemplified by figures like Tucker Carlson.

MORAL AND GEOPOLITICAL IMPERATIVES FOR SUPPORTING UKRAINE

The conversation emphasizes the dual moral and national interest in supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression. Stephens argues that defending a victimized democracy against an authoritarian bully aligns with U.S. interests in maintaining a rules-based international order. Failure to support Ukraine, he contends, emboldens other autocrats, like Xi Jinping, and poses a greater long-term danger to global stability and democratic values.

UKRAINIAN RESILIENCE AND THE REALITIES OF WAR

Stephens shares his observations from a recent trip to Ukraine, highlighting the remarkable resilience and determination of its people. Despite constant threats from Russian attacks, Kyiv is described as striving for normalcy while fiercely defending its territory. The Ukrainian resolve to reclaim all lost lands, including Crimea, is underscored, reflecting a deep commitment to sovereignty that challenges simplistic notions of conflict resolution and settlement.

THE FAILURE OF EXPERTS AND THE EROSION OF TRUST

A central theme is the widespread distrust in experts and institutions, exacerbated by perceived failures during the COVID-19 pandemic and other public policy challenges. Stephens argues that the arrogance and reluctance of some experts to acknowledge their missteps have fueled this distrust. This has created an environment where public perception often dismisses established knowledge in favor of personal research or alternative narratives, deeply impacting discourse on various issues.

MISINFORMATION, FREE SPEECH, AND THE CHALLENGE OF SOCIAL MEDIA

The discussion delves into the tension between combating misinformation and upholding free speech. Stephens critiques the heavy-handed censorship tactics employed by social media platforms, suggesting they can inadvertently legitimize fringe voices and create a 'Streisand Effect.' He posits that while misinformation is a genuine problem, attempts to rigidly control information may be less effective than open discussion, though acknowledges the unique role of algorithms in amplifying divisive content.

JOURNALISTIC ETHICS AND THE HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP CONTROVERSY

The handling of the Hunter Biden laptop story serves as a case study for journalistic ethics and perceived media bias. Stephens argues that withholding legitimate news, even due to timing concerns ahead of an election, undermines media credibility. He believes journalists should report verifiable information impartially, allowing voters to make their own decisions, rather than attempting to influence outcomes, which can drive audiences towards less credible sources.

THE COMPLEXITY OF PUBLIC HEALTH MESSAGING AND TRADE-OFFS

Public health communication, particularly during crises like COVID-19, is analyzed for its paternalistic tendencies and failure to acknowledge necessary trade-offs. Stephens suggests that officials should have been more transparent about uncertainties and recognized that public health is one component of the broader public interest. Sacrificing essential aspects like children's education for public health goals is presented as an example of overreach that requires acknowledgment and apology.

THE PERILS OF DE-PLATFORMING AND THE ECHO CHAMBER EFFECT

The practice of de-platforming prominent figures, including political leaders and controversial personalities, is examined. Stephens suggests that such actions can confer a victim status that benefits those being silenced, drawing a parallel to the increased prominence of figures like Alex Jones and Donald Trump after being de-platformed. He advocates for more open dialogue, viewing the 'ecology of truth' as one that must contain falsehoods to be properly understood.

THE SHIFT FROM THE LEFT TO THE RIGHT ON PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLES

An interesting observation is made about the historical shift in attitudes towards the precautionary principle regarding new drugs and technologies. Traditionally championed by the left, concerns about extensive testing and potential unforeseen consequences have seemingly migrated, with elements of the 'anti-vaxx' sentiment once associated with the left now finding resonance on the right, particularly in certain populist movements.

THE ROLE OF RADIO AND TV PERSONALITIES IN SHAPING OPINION

The influence of media personalities like Tucker Carlson is discussed in shaping public opinion and political discourse. Carlson's perceived cynicism and ability to tap into a sentiment that 'it's all a lie' is seen as a powerful, albeit toxic, force within certain political movements. His ability to cultivate an audience that either ignores or accepts apparent hypocrisy highlights a broader trend in political communication and audience engagement.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Companies

●Organizations

●Books

●Concepts

●People Referenced

Common Questions

The Republican Party has largely shifted from a conservative internationalist stance to one of 'truculent nationalism' or quasi-isolationism, especially since the ascendancy of Donald Trump. Many Republicans now view figures like Putin as models of strong leadership and express skepticism towards international alliances like NATO.

Topics

Foreign Policy Ukraine War Society & Philosophy Trust In Institutions Republican Party Political Polarization Free Speech Journalism Ethics Politics & Policy

Mentioned in this video

People

Donald Trump Jr.

His hypothetical laptop is used as a counter-example to illustrate the principle that journalistic reporting should be consistent regardless of political party.

Bret Stephens

Op-ed columnist for The New York Times and author, guest on the podcast. He shares his background in journalism, his views on the Republican Party, foreign policy, and media ethics.

Vladimir Putin

President of Russia whose invasion of Ukraine and perceived authoritarianism are central to the discussion about the Republican Party's foreign policy reversal.

Mark Hamill

His voice is part of the 'air alert app' in Ukraine, used to notify people of incoming threats.

Gene Carroll

Accuser of Donald Trump, mentioned as an example of a serious allegation that should be taken seriously by the media, regardless of the political leanings of the accused.

Tucker Carlson

Influential conservative commentator whose rhetoric and perceived cynicism are analyzed for their role in shaping Republican attitudes towards Russia and nationalism.

Harry Truman

Mentioned in the context of Republican internationalism and historical alliances concerning foreign policy.

Xi Jinping

Referred to as 'ji', President of China, implicitly linked to authoritarian actions and potential future aggression, with the outcome in Ukraine being a data point for his decisions.

Donald Trump

Former U.S. President whose ascendancy is discussed as a turning point for the Republican Party and its foreign policy stances. His potential return to the presidency and legal troubles are also mentioned.

Joe Rogan

Host of a popular podcast, mentioned as a platform where figures like RFK Jr. could be interviewed, embodying the idea of open debate.

Sam Harris

Host of the Making Sense podcast, conducting the interview with Bret Stephens. He discusses his background, his views on politics, and the issues raised in the conversation.

Alex Jones

Infowars host, mentioned as an extreme example of someone de-platformed, raising questions about censorship, misinformation, and the 'ecology of truth'.

Arthur Vandenberg

Mentioned in the context of the Republican Party's historical commitment to internationalism.

Vivek Ramaswamy

Mentioned as a Republican figure claiming the 2020 election was stolen due to the lack of timely coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story.

Rudy Giuliani

Mentioned for his role in releasing the Hunter Biden laptop story just before the 2020 election, and his perceived gamesmanship.

Companies

Twitter

Social media platform whose past ban of Donald Trump is discussed in relation to de-platforming and its potential backfiring effects.

Organizations

NATO

North Atlantic Treaty Organization, discussed in relation to Russian concerns about its expansion and its role as a defensive alliance.

University of Chicago

University attended by Bret Stephens for college, mentioned as part of his educational background.

Locations

Ukraine

The country at the center of the geopolitical discussion, examining the shift in Republican attitudes, the moral and national interest case for US support, and Bret Stephens's recent visit.

Mexico City

City where Bret Stephens was raised, mentioned as part of his personal background and a formative experience.

Russia

Country led by Putin, whose actions in Ukraine and historical relationship with its neighbors are central to the discussion on foreign policy and the Republican Party's shift.

Wuhan

Mentioned in the context of Facebook's initial ban on discussing the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a potential source of COVID-19, highlighting concerns about biased censorship.

Taiwan

Island nation whose potential conflict with China is discussed in the context of geopolitical signaling from the war in Ukraine.

New York City

Bret Stephens's birthplace, mentioned as part of his personal background.

Concepts

Hunter Biden laptop

The controversy surrounding the laptop's data is used as a case study for issues of media ethics, election timing, misinformation, and de-platforming.

Books

America in Retreat: The New Isolationism and the Coming Global Disorder

A book authored by Bret Stephens, discussing isolationism and global disorder.