Why does John McWhorter compare the 'woke' movement to a religion?

He likens it to a religion because its adherents often cannot be reasoned with on certain topics, exhibit fervent belief, treat dissenters as heretics, and derive a sense of purpose and belonging from adherence to its catechism, much like fundamentalist religions.

Is it possible to reason with people who adhere to 'woke racism' ideology?

McWhorter argues that it is largely impossible to reason with people fully immersed in this ideology, especially on issues of race. He suggests that energy is better spent learning to coexist gracefully with their views rather than trying to change their minds.

How has the idea of 'power dynamics' shifted in the context of race and employment?

McWhorter contends that in many desirable organizations, a white male applicant is now at a disadvantage, and a Black applicant would be positively advantaged, reversing historical power structures. He criticizes this as a new form of 'tokenism' that disadvantages individuals based on race.

What is the difference between acknowledging past racism and attributing current disparities solely to present racism?

McWhorter explains that while historical racism (like redlining) can explain present disparities (like wealth inequality), it doesn't automatically mean current disparities are due to ongoing racist policies or attitudes. He calls the simplistic attribution of any disparity to present racism an 'elementary' and often fallacious argument.

Why does McWhorter criticize the idea that current social justice issues are just a 'tempest in a teacup' for over-educated people?

He argues that this perspective is dangerous because the 'woke' ideology is actively taking over crucial institutions of learning, justice, and art. He believes this is a more significant threat than burgeoning white supremacy movements, as it undermines the foundations of societal discourse and intellectual rigor.

What is 'solutionism' in the context of 'woke racism'?

McWhorter uses the term 'solutionism' to describe the criticism leveled against efforts to pragmatically address problems. Within the 'woke racism' framework, practical solutions are denigrated, and the focus remains on identifying and critiquing power differentials, often without offering effective remedies.

Key Moments

The Religion of Anti-Racism: A Conversation with John McWhorter

Sam Harris

Science & Technology4 min read36 min video

Oct 27, 2021|121,031 views|3,075|1,096

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

John McWhorter argues 'woke racism' functions as a religion, betraying Black America by prioritizing performative activism over progress.

Key Insights

The 'woke' social justice movement operates like a religion, characterized by dogma, intolerance, and a refusal to engage in reasoned debate.

This new 'religion' has infiltrated institutions, leading to a focus on abstract concepts of power and equity over practical solutions.

The emphasis on systemic racism causes confusion between historical injustices and present-day issues, leading to flawed logic.

Current equity standards often disadvantage qualified white men, a reversal of historical trends, and this is a new form of tokenism.

The movement promotes a simplified, almost infantile understanding of complex social issues, particularly race, discouraging genuine curiosity.

This 'woke racism' is ultimately a disservice to Black Americans, offering performative gestures rather than tangible advancements.

THE RELIGIOUS FRAMEWORK OF WOKE IDEOLOGY

John McWhorter posits that the contemporary social justice movement, particularly concerning race, functions as a religion rather than a mere ideology. He argues that this 'faith' is characterized by unreasoning dogma, intolerance towards differing viewpoints, and a reliance on faith-based pronouncements rather than empirical evidence or logical discourse. This religious framework prevents meaningful dialogue, as adherents are not open to reasoned debate but rather treat dissenters as heretics who must be ostracized or punished. McWhorter highlights the fervor and sense of moral certainty within this movement, drawing parallels to fundamentalist religious practices.

INSTITUTIONAL CAPTURE AND PERFORMANCE OVER PROGRESS

A significant concern raised is the infiltration of this 'woke religion' into various institutions, including academia, media, and corporate environments. McWhorter argues that this has led to a refounding of societal norms and priorities around a narrow set of beliefs, primarily centering on the battle against perceived power differentials. This often manifests as performative activism, where demonstrating awareness of systemic racism and issuing pronouncements about it are prioritized over tangible efforts to address complex social issues. The focus shifts from achieving actual progress to signaling adherence to the group's catechism.

CONFUSING PAST INJUSTICES WITH PRESENT REALITIES

McWhorter identifies a critical flaw in the movement's logic: the conflation of historical racism with present-day disparities. While acknowledging the undeniable legacy of past injustices like redlining and segregation, he contends that these historical factors do not automatically explain all current inequalities in wealth, education, or health. The movement's tendency to label any observed disparity as direct evidence of ongoing systemic racism is presented as an oversimplification that ignores the complex interplay of historical context and contemporary societal dynamics. This misattribution hinders effective problem-solving.

REVERSAL OF EQUITY AND NEW FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION

The conversation delves into the paradox of equity initiatives, where the pursuit of fairness has, in some contexts, led to a direct disadvantage for historically dominant groups, specifically white men. McWhorter argues that in many desirable organizations, qualified Black applicants are now likely to be advantaged, a stark reversal of the past. This has created a new form of 'tokenism,' where individuals may be hired or promoted not solely on merit but due to their identity, leading to situations where being a white male can be a significant professional disadvantage. This is presented as a deviation from the more nuanced approaches to affirmative action seen in prior decades.

THE 'STRUCTIONALIZATION' OF COMPLACENCY AND IMMATURITY

McWhorter critiques the movement for encouraging a simplified and often immature understanding of complex issues, particularly race. He suggests that this approach is a form of 'recreational victimization' that became possible only when genuine hardships for Black Americans lessened significantly. Instead of fostering genuine intellectual curiosity and mature engagement with societal problems, the movement promotes a larval psychological state where complex issues are reduced to simplistic, moralistic narratives. Adopting this viewpoint is presented as easy and therapeutic, offering a sense of belonging and perceived insight without demanding real intellectual effort.

THE FAILURE TO ADDRESS REAL NEEDS AND THE BETRAYAL OF BLACK AMERICA

Ultimately, McWhorter argues that this 'woke racism' is a 'shitty religion' that fails to genuinely uplift Black Americans. By focusing on abstract notions of power and privilege, and by demanding adherence to prescribed ideologies, the movement diverts energy and attention from practical solutions that could create substantive change. The emphasis on performative declarations and the condemnation of any who deviate from the dogma result in a culture that is not only irrational but also actively harmful, particularly to the very communities it claims to serve. This new faith, he asserts, betrays Black America by offering hollow validation instead of genuine progress.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Companies

●Organizations

●Books

●Studies Cited

●Concepts

●People Referenced

Common Questions

McWhorter's central argument is that the contemporary social justice movement, particularly concerning race, has evolved into a new religion. This 'woke racism' is characterized by irrationality, dogma, and a focus on combating power differentials, which he argues ultimately betrays Black America.

Topics

Mindset & Self-Improvement Society & Philosophy Public Discourse Identity Politics Cultural Critique Social Justice Moral Philosophy Institutional Critique Critical Race Theory Politics & Policy

Mentioned in this video

Books

Woke Racism: How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America

John McWhorter's new book, which critiques the social justice narrative as a new religion that has negatively impacted Black America.

Organizations

Supreme Court

Mentioned as an example of an institution that could be seen as conservative-leaning.

New York Times

A major newspaper where John McWhorter is a new columnist.

The Atlantic

A magazine where John McWhorter is a contributing editor.

People

Claude Shannon

Mentioned as an example of an exceptionally brilliant individual needed to even be considered for desirable positions in the current job market, highlighting a perceived shift from meritocracy.

Le Pen

Mentioned alongside 'friends on the right' in the context of evaluating threats to institutions.

Sam Harris

Host of the Making Sense Podcast.

Ibram X. Kendi

Cited as an example of someone applauded for being irrational and contemptuous of reason, particularly in the context of defining racism.

John McWhorter

Linguistics, American Studies, and Music History professor at Columbia University, contributor to The New York Times, contributing editor at The Atlantic, host of Lexicon Valley podcast, and author of 'Woke Racism'.

Thomas Aquinas

Mentioned to illustrate a historical period where intellectual discourse was limited to specific topics, akin to the current limitations imposed by 'woke' ideology.

John Stuart Mill

Mentioned as an example of a philosopher whose ideas are unlikely to persuade adherents of the 'woke racism' religion.

Media

The Jeffersons

A television show mentioned alongside 'All in the Family' as a cultural reference point for 'tokenism'.

All in the Family

A television show mentioned as a cultural reference point for discussing 'tokenism' in hiring.

Making Sense Podcast

The podcast hosted by Sam Harris where the conversation with John McWhorter takes place.

Lexicon Valley

A podcast hosted by John McWhorter about language.

Studies & Research

Tuskegee experiments

Cited as a historical example of racism in healthcare that could explain residual distrust in the medical establishment, but cautioned against conflating past causes with present conditions.

Concepts

QAnon

Mentioned as a movement associated with white supremacy and the events following the Trump presidency.