What were the three main components of the Deep Vision project?

The three components were: 1) Virus hunting, involving collecting thousands of viruses from remote locations like bat caves. 2) Characterization, to identify the most dangerous, pandemic-grade viruses. 3) Publication, of the collected virus genomes to the public, enabling anyone with the technical know-how to recreate them.

Why is collecting viruses from bat caves considered high-risk?

Collecting viruses from remote places like bat caves and bringing them into laboratories, even high-security ones, is risky because laboratories are imperfect and known to leak. An isolated bat cave is considered a safer place for a dangerous pathogen than a leaky lab.

What is the danger of publishing virus genomes?

Publishing the genomes of potentially deadly viruses gives around 30,000 individuals worldwide the capability to synthesize these pathogens from scratch using techniques like reverse genetics. This essentially arms unvetted individuals with bioweapon potential on par with nuclear weapons.

How was the Deep Vision project stopped?

A coalition of individuals and organizations, including figures like Daniel Schmachtenberger and Praveen Basu from Helena, along with support from politicians like Senators Lindsey Graham, James Risch, and Rand Paul, worked quietly to apply pressure. This led to the program being effectively defanged and eventually formally killed by USAID.

Are other countries engaged in similar virus-hunting activities?

Yes, programs like the Wuhan Institute of Virology's work on coronaviruses and the previous USAID program 'Predict' engaged in similar virus collection. However, Deep Vision's scale, aiming for 10,000 viruses, was considered unprecedentedly large and risky.

How does AI impact the risk of bioweapons?

AI is a significant factor because it will accelerate the capabilities for creating dangerous pathogens. Coupled with the ability to publish genomes, AI could drastically reduce the time and expertise needed to engineer novel bioweapons, increasing the risk exponentially.

Key Moments

The DEEP VZN Scandal: How Good Intentions Nearly Ended the World

Sam Harris

Science & Technology3 min read24 min video

Mar 11, 2026|21,638 views|422|120

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

US government's DEEP VZN project, aimed at finding dangerous viruses, was halted due to catastrophic risk concerns.

Key Insights

The DEEP VZN program aimed to discover and characterize potentially pandemic-grade viruses from remote locations.

The program's core activities involved 'virus hunting,' genetic characterization, and open publication of findings and virus genomes.

Critics argued that collecting and studying dangerous viruses in leaky labs increases the risk of accidental release or weaponization.

The open publication of virus genomes could equip thousands of unvetted individuals with the means to create bioweapons.

A concerted whistleblowing effort involving public figures, scientists, and policymakers successfully pressured the US government to halt the program.

While DEEP VZN was stopped, the underlying risks of bioweapons development, exacerbated by AI, persist globally.

THE ORIGINS OF CONCERN: BIORISK AND DEEP VZN

Rob Reid discusses his decade-long focus on biorisk, stemming from writing a science fiction novel that featured a synthetic biology-based pandemic. This personal exploration led to a TED talk and collaborations, eventually bringing him into contact with the US government's Agency for International Development (USAID). A startling discovery within USAID was the DEEP VZN program, a $125 million, five-year initiative with the stated intention of improving global biosecurity but which a prominent expert described as having the potential to 'cancel civilization.'

DEEP VZN'S THREE DANGEROUS PROPOSITIONS

DEEP VZN was built upon three core, risky ideas. Firstly, 'virus hunting' involved collecting up to 10,000 undiscovered viruses from remote locations like bat caves and bush meat markets in developing countries, bringing them into densely populated areas for study. Secondly, 'characterization' aimed to identify which of these viruses were most likely to be pandemic-grade, a process that could inadvertently highlight potential bioweapons. Finally, the program planned to publish the genomes of these dangerous viruses openly, effectively distributing bioweapon blueprints globally.

THE INHERENT RISKS OF VIRUS COLLECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION

The practice of 'virus hunting' and subsequent genetic 'characterization' carries significant risks. Laboratories, even at the highest biosafety levels, are known to leak, and there is no standardized reporting system to track these incidents. Bringing potentially deadly pathogens into these 'leaky vessels' in populated areas is more dangerous than them remaining in isolated natural environments. Furthermore, identifying 'pandemic grade' viruses doesn't offer practical benefits like vaccine development without live testing, which is ethically impossible for deadly pathogens. Instead, it creates a list of highly dangerous viruses that could attract unwanted attention from nefarious actors.

OPEN PUBLICATION: ARMING POTENTIAL ADVERSARIES

The most alarming aspect of DEEP VZN was its intention to publish the genomes of dangerous viruses discovered and characterized. At the time, an estimated 30,000 individuals worldwide possessed the technical skills and knowledge to synthesize these viruses from scratch using techniques like reverse genetics. This plan would have effectively granted near-nuclear-arsenal-level destructive power to thousands of unvetted individuals globally, potentially including those in unstable regions or with malicious intent, thereby democratizing bioweapon creation to an unprecedented degree.

THE WHISTLEBLOWING CAMPAIGN AND PROGRAM HALT

Upon learning of DEEP VZN, Rob Reid collaborated with Sam Harris to raise public awareness through a podcast episode, specifically targeting then-USAID administrator Samantha Power. Despite initial silence, a broader coalition, including figures like Tristan Harris, Daniel Schmokenberger, and organizations like Helena (with Pro Basu playing a key role), emerged. Pressure mounted through bipartisan efforts, including actions by Senators Lindsey Graham, James Risch, and Rand Paul, leading to the program being effectively defanged and eventually formally terminated in September 2023, removing a significant source of plausible bioweapon risk.

THE PERSISTENT THREAT IN A CHANGING LANDSCAPE

While DEEP VZN was successfully dismantled, the fundamental threat remains. Other nations, like China's Wuhan Institute of Virology, have engaged in similar virus collection efforts, and past US-funded programs like Predict also collected vast numbers of viruses. Crucially, advancements in artificial intelligence are significantly accelerating the potential for bioweapon development. The ability to synthesize dangerous pathogens from publicly available genetic information, a capability highlighted by the publication of the 1918 flu genome, is now far more accessible, posing an escalating global security challenge.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Software & Apps

●Organizations

●Concepts

●People Referenced

Common Questions

Deep Vision was a USAID-authorized program with a $125 million budget aimed at discovering and studying novel viruses. It was controversial because its three main components—virus hunting in remote areas, characterizing deadly viruses, and publishing their genomes—were seen as creating extreme biosecurity risks, potentially empowering individuals to create bioweapons.

Topics

Existential Risk Health & Longevity Technology & Innovation Science & Mathematics Global Health Pandemic Risk Virus Discovery AI And Bioweapons

Mentioned in this video

People

Naval Ravikant

An investor and entrepreneur, who was interviewed by Rob Reed for his podcast 'After'.

Rob Reed

Podcast guest and whistleblower who investigated the Deep Vision project for its potential to cause catastrophic harm.

Tristan Harris

A former Google design ethicist and co-founder of the Center for Humane Technology, who helped organize a brainstorm session about existential risks.

Rand Paul

A U.S. Senator who held a hearing in the summer of 2022 where Kevin Esfeld testified about Deep Vision.

Chris Anderson

Co-founder of TED, known for his work in venture capital and promoting impactful ideas.

Samantha Power

Administrator of USAID at the time, who was an initial target for the whistleblower effort regarding Deep Vision.

Lindsey Graham

A U.S. Senator who, along with Senator James Risch, had staff who became aware of Deep Vision and expressed concerns to USAID.

Daniel Schmachtenberger

An existential risk thinker who curated a group of experts to brainstorm solutions for existential threats, including the Deep Vision project.

Software & Apps

PREDICT

A previous USAID-funded program that discovered a significant number of novel mammalian viruses.

Organizations

White House

The executive branch of the U.S. federal government, which invited Rob Reed to present on biosecurity.

TED

A non-profit organization that presents talks on various subjects, where Rob Reed gave a talk related to biosecurity risks.

USAID

The United States Agency for International Development, which authorized the Deep Vision project.

Wuhan Institute of Virology

A virology research institute in Wuhan, China, also known as WIV, which has been involved in collecting and understanding coronaviruses.

Concepts

Deep Vision

A USAD authorized program with a $125 million budget intended to discover and analyze novel viruses, which was criticized for its extreme biosecurity risks.

Synthetic Biology

The field of biology concerned with developing new biological parts, devices, and systems, or redesigning existing, natural biological systems for useful purposes.