Why does Castellian aim to fill a non-nuclear deterrence gap?

The conversation argues that the U.S. has fallen behind peers like China in non-nuclear deterrence. Castellian seeks to restore a middle ground between economic sanctions and nuclear deterrence to deter conflict without nuclear conflict. Timestamp-based reference: 167.

Why did Brian leave SpaceX to start Castellian?

Brian describes being drawn by the need to fix slow, expensive, and frequently late defense programs with a Silicon Valley-style approach to rapid, affordable development. He cites SpaceX as a proving point but argues traditional aerospace is stuck in 'the definition of insanity.' Timestamp-based reference: 251.

How does Castellian approach selling to the government differently?

The team explains enterprise-style sales dynamics: build relationships, understand real user pain, prove delivery with consistent updates, and earn trust through repeat, transparent progress. The process is long and collaborative, with multiple stakeholders. Timestamp-based reference: 736.

What Ukraine taught about defense production and procurement?

Ukraine revealed that simply scaling production isn’t reliable; there are gaps in producing long-range munitions, and the need is to scale both deterrence and manufacturing capacity to deter escalation. The conversation emphasizes re-industrialization and a more resilient supply chain. Timestamp-based reference: 1267.

What role does manufacturing strategy and nearshoring play for defense?

The discussion argues for re-industrialization, nearshoring, and diversifying the supply chain to ensure defense products can be produced at the velocity and scale needed, with dual-use opportunities surfacing as the technology matures. Timestamp-based reference: 1390.

What makes the founder optimistic about American dynamism?

The speaker highlights America’s ability to reinvigorate industries through targeted investment (like the American Dynamism Fund) and a culture of problem-solving, entrepreneurship, and efficient reform—seeing defense tech as a catalyst for broader economic revitalization. Timestamp-based reference: 1826.

How This Hypersonic Missile Startup Will Transform National Security

a16z

Gaming5 min read32 min video

Dec 11, 2025|319 views|12|1

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

Hypersonic deterrence, speed to deliver, and U.S. reindustrialization via Castellian.

Key Insights

Hypersonic missiles offer long range, extreme speed, and high survivability, creating a credible deterrent and encouraging diplomacy over conflict.

The U.S. lags behind adversaries like China in mass-produced, affordable hypersonics, risking a loss of non-nuclear deterrence unless speed and scale improve.

Castellian's founder cites SpaceX’s systems engineering and cost discipline as a model for delivering complex weapons faster and cheaper.

Selling to the government is an enterprise-sale process: build trust through user engagement, frequent updates, and demonstrable delivery, not just a product pitch.

Procurement reform is underway, but entrenched rules slow decision-making; faster planning, funding, and contracting are critical to resilience.

Ukraine has shown that production scale and speed matter as much as technological capability; deterrence relies on scalable manufacturing and supply chains.

UNDERSTANDING HYPERSONIC MISSILES

Hypersonic missiles, as described by Castellian's founder, offer three core attributes that shape deterrence: long range, extreme speed, and high survivability. The practical value comes from flying fast enough and far enough to reduce the window of vulnerability, and to survive defenses en route to a target. The combination enables a credible option that can deter adversaries from escalating. Castellian emphasizes that the upper atmosphere provides low drag for the same missile size, enabling rapid delivery and reinforcing deterrence by signaling capability to reach adversaries if necessary.

DETERRENCE IN THE MODERN AGE

The discussion reframes deterrence beyond nuclear forces, highlighting a missing middle ground in national security. The host explains that non-nuclear deterrence has eroded, and current capabilities are insufficient to deter strategic aggression. The conversation references game-theory concepts such as the prisoners’ dilemma and tit-for-tat with forgiveness, arguing for a continuum of options—from economic sanctions to non-nuclear strategic capabilities—to prevent conflict and bring adversaries back to negotiation tables.

FROM SPACEX TO CASTILLIAN: A FOUNDER'S CALLING

The founder explains leaving SpaceX—not for a lack of opportunity but to address the pace, cost, and complexity of traditional aerospace weapons programs. SpaceX demonstrated that complex systems could be engineered and produced rapidly and affordably, challenging the status quo in the defense sector. This insight—mixed with a belief in capitalism and competition—drives Castellian’s mission to recreate that acceleration in missile development and manufacturing, seeking to overcome the incentives that slow incumbents and stifle innovation.

THE PROBLEM WITH TRADITIONAL AEROSPACE

Traditional aerospace approaches struggle with long cycles, high costs, and slow evolution of weapon systems. The guest notes that the industry often reaches the limit of technical complexity, risking cancellation when schedules slip or budgets blow up. The result is a deterrence gap, as adversaries advance while the domestic industry remains constrained. Castellian argues that a different approach—emphasizing speed, cost discipline, and modular engineering—can reverse this trajectory and deliver scalable capabilities rather than one-off, over-budget prototypes.

GOVERNMENT MARKET ENTRY: EARLY DAYS

Entering the government market begins with deeply understanding the user problem. Castellian prioritized talking to actual operators and capturing what they need beyond what existing missiles provide. This involves leveraging models and analyses from laboratories and research centers, often classified, to quantify added value. The company sought a willing customer willing to take a chance on novel methods, and then established a cadence of delivering on commitments every few months to build trust and demonstrate reliability.

FINDING THE RIGHT BUYERS IN DC

Finding government buyers resembles enterprise sales: it’s about warm introductions, credibility, and repeated demonstrations of execution. The team emphasizes that walking through the door with a compelling story is not enough; follow-through matters—three-month checkpoints, transparent progress, and a clear plan for the next steps build trust. The customer base is not a single entity but a network of offices and partners who must see value and reliability before committing, which is why relationship-building is central.

PROCURMENT REFORM: SLOWNESS VS SPEED

There is recognition in Washington that procurement rules, designed to prevent mistakes, often impede speed and innovation. The discussion notes reform efforts aimed at shortening planning cycles, improving agility, and enabling faster funding decisions. The Ukraine crisis underscored the mismatch between fast-moving threats and slow, deliberate budgeting. Reform is framed as essential to enhancing national resilience, particularly in munitions production and critical supply chains, without sacrificing accountability.

UKRAINE AS A LESSON FOR DEFENSE PLANNING

The Ukraine conflict reveals that modern warfare requires far more than drones; it demands scalable, long-range munitions and robust production capacity. The conversation highlights the neglect of larger-scale manufacturing in defense planning and the need for diversified, resilient supply chains. Being able to ramp up production quickly is a deterrent in itself, as adversaries must weigh the consequences of attempting aggression when the defender can sustain the effort over time.

RE-INDUSTRIALIZATION AS A NATIONAL STRATEGY

A central thread is that the U.S. must reindustrialize—strengthening manufacturing, supply chains, and critical materials. The discussion points to dual-use technologies and the broader opportunity to apply defense-driven innovation to civilian sectors. The narrative connects these needs to a broader ecosystem of investment and policy support, including venture funding and reform-minded approaches that accelerate domestic production capabilities and reduce dependence on foreign suppliers.

BUILDING A CULTURE OF URGENCY

Castellian emphasizes the importance of a bias toward action and aggressive scheduling to avoid stagnation. An urgent culture helps ensure that engineers do not over-extend projects but instead deliver functional subsystems on a defined timeline. Hiring practices, leadership tone, and internal incentives align to push for rapid progress, while ensuring that work remains rigorous. The goal is to create a disciplined yet fast-moving organization capable of turning ambitious plans into tangible, timely results.

MAKE/BUY DECISIONS IN PRACTICE

The company employs a pragmatic make-versus-buy approach. It aims to buy from reliable vendors when possible to accelerate development, only resorting to in-house production when essential to meet schedule or quality needs. This philosophy extends to subcomponents like motors and other critical parts; if an external supplier can outperform, Castellian will source externally. The strategy reflects a broader preference for speed and reliability, paired with selective internal capability development when market options fall short.

OPTIMISM ABOUT AMERICAN DYNAMISM

The founder expresses strong optimism about building an American defense-tech ecosystem and reindustrializing the U.S. economy. The sense is that public-private collaboration, accelerated by reform and strategic investment, can renew manufacturing and maintain leadership. Gratitude is extended to investors and partners, including early backing for defense tech initiatives that may seem risky, underscoring a belief that the U.S. can outpace competitors through disciplined execution and a reinvigorated national industrial base.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Software & Apps

●Companies

●Studies Cited

●People Referenced

Common Questions

A hypersonic missile travels at Mach five or faster, enabling long-range reach, rapid travel, and high survivability, which together contribute to deterrence by making an adversary think twice before escalating. The discussion emphasizes three core benefits: long distance, quick arrival, and difficulty in interception. Timestamp-based reference: 52.