Why is there a new spirit of cynicism around doing good?

A spirit of cynicism has emerged due to perceived hypocrisy in initiatives like ESG, DEI, and effective altruism, fueled by events like the Sam Bankman-Fried scandal and high-profile figures exhibiting selfishness. This leads some to believe altruism is bogus.

What was the controversy with Coleman Hughes at TED?

Coleman Hughes gave a talk advocating for colorblindness, which some found controversial and upsetting, particularly on the left, arguing it ignores ongoing racial injustice. The handling of his talk led to accusations of censorship from the right.

How does the internet change generosity?

The internet allows acts of generosity to spread rapidly and at an unlimited scale, creating ripple effects. It also makes it easier to leverage technology and knowledge for greater impact, enabling new digital business models centered around giving.

Is there a cost to being generous?

While generosity can feel good and lead to positive outcomes, individuals often feel the fear of loss. It's important to balance generous instincts with reasoned decision-making to ensure resources are used wisely and effectively.

What is the difference between intentions, rewards, and results in giving?

Intentions, the personal reward from giving, and the actual results achieved are distinct but all matter. Effective giving involves optimizing for results through research, while also acknowledging the personal satisfaction and the ethical importance of one's motivations.

What is 'wise selfishness'?

Wise selfishness suggests that caring for others and acting generously can be a highly effective strategy for one's own well-being and long-term happiness, blurring the line between self-interest and altruism.

What is the science behind generosity?

Science suggests humans are biologically wired for cooperation and generosity, not purely selfish survival. Experiments show people tend to be generous with unexpected windfalls, and the act of giving itself provides uplift.

Why is Chris Anderson critical of the DEI language?

Anderson believes the language used in DEI has become so tribalistic that it obfuscates the original good intentions of addressing injustice. It alienates people and makes productive conversations about real issues impossible.

What are Chris Anderson's thoughts on billionaire philanthropy?

Anderson touches on the ethics of large-scale philanthropy, acknowledging its potential but also the need for careful consideration of motives and effectiveness, especially in the current climate of cynicism.

How does Sam Harris's podcast business model work?

Sam Harris's podcast operates on a reader-supported, ad-free model with a paywall for full episodes. However, a scholarship program offers free access to anyone who cannot afford a subscription, emphasizing accessibility over profit.

What is 'bridging generosity'?

Bridging generosity is the willingness to listen to and understand people from opposing viewpoints with respect, attempting to find common ground. It's seen as a critical skill for tackling societal problems in a divided world.

Key Moments

Generosity, Cynicism, and the Future of Doing Good: A Conversation with Chris Anderson(Episode #349)

Sam Harris

Science & Technology4 min read64 min video

Jan 16, 2024|41,521 views|717|273

sam harris sam harris podcast waking up podcast waking up waking up with sam harris sam harris waking up waking up sam harris sam harris jordan peterson sam harris joe rogan author neuroscientist philosopher

Save to Pod

Key Moments

TL;DR

Chris Anderson discusses generosity, cynicism, and technology's role in a hopeful future.

Key Insights

A rising tide of cynicism in tech and finance questions the sincerity of 'doing good'.

Effective altruism and DEI initiatives face criticism, sometimes drawing valid points, sometimes oversimplified conclusions.

The internet's potential for spreading both positive and negative ideas requires conscious effort to amplify generosity.

Mixed motives in giving are normal; focusing on results and celebrating any act of good is more productive than demanding moral purity.

Generosity has biological and psychological roots, making it a powerful human trait that can be leveraged for positive change.

Digital business models can foster generosity by allowing for free access with paid options for those who can afford it.

THE RISE OF CYNICISM AND THE NEED FOR GENEROSITY

Chris Anderson observes a growing cynicism, particularly in tech and finance, that views efforts to do good as mere virtue signaling or scams. This skepticism is amplified by recent high-profile failures and hypocrisies, leading many to adopt a more narrowly selfish outlook. Anderson and Sam Harris express concern that this trend, if unchecked, could lead to a dangerous ethical regression. Anderson’s book, 'Infectious Generosity,' aims to counter this by highlighting the scientific and practical reasons for embracing generosity as a vital human trait and a powerful force for good in the interconnected digital age.

NAVIGATING COMPLEX DEBATES: DEI AND COLOR BLINDNESS

The conversation delves into controversial topics like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and the concept of color blindness, exemplified by the Coleman Hughes controversy at TED. Harris critiques DEI, while Anderson acknowledges its origins in addressing genuine injustices but notes its recent warping into divisive, ineffective language. Regarding Hughes's talk on color blindness, Anderson explains TED's effort to host diverse viewpoints, even controversial ones, aiming for broader discourse. He acknowledges the backlash but defends TED’s commitment to an open tent, suggesting that the goal is a future where race is irrelevant, even if the path to get there is debated.

THE SCIENCE AND POWER OF GENEROSITY

Anderson explores the scientific underpinnings of generosity, detailing how unselfish behavior can be an evolutionary advantage, fostering cooperation and civilization. He highlights research demonstrating humans are wired to respond to generosity, citing an experiment where recipients of unexpected money largely shared it. This inherent capacity, combined with the internet's ability to amplify acts of kindness, forms the basis of his 'infectious generosity' concept. It suggests that positive actions can indeed go viral, offering a path to reclaiming the internet as a force for good and building a more hopeful future.

CHALLENGING MOTIVES: REALISM OVER PURITY

The discussion challenges the notion of purely altruistic motives, arguing that mixed intentions in giving are normal and not inherently bad. Anderson advocates for shifting focus from scrutinizing motives to celebrating the good that results. While acknowledging the importance of intentions, he suggests that even if reputation or self-satisfaction plays a role, the act of giving and its positive impact should be embraced and encouraged. This realistic approach, he argues, can unlock greater generosity by reducing fear of criticism and encouraging more people to act.

OPTIMIZING ALTRUISM: INTENTIONS, REWARDS, AND RESULTS

Sam Harris introduces the concept of distinguishing between intentions, personal rewards from giving, and actual results. He credits the effective altruism movement with helping him recognize these distinctions, allowing him to optimize for results while treating personal satisfaction from giving as a gratifying outcome. This nuanced approach involves strategic giving, prioritizing impactful charities, but also allowing for personal fulfillment through causes that resonate emotionally. The goal is to be both wise in our giving and personally rewarded by it, leading to a more sustainable and impactful form of philanthropy.

BUSINESS MODELS AND FOSTERING GENEROSITY

Harris shares his unique business model for his podcast and app, which combines a paywall with a robust scholarship program for those who cannot afford it. He contrasts this with the traditional expectation that podcasts should be free, noting that the 'free' model can sometimes obscure important considerations about cost and value. By implementing a paid subscription for full access, while maintaining accessibility for all, he believes he can create a more sustainable and transparent system that aligns with generosity and allows for greater impact. Anderson sees parallels with TED's model of offering valuable content that supports its mission.

THE GENEROSITY OF BRIDGING DIVISIONS

Anderson identifies 'bridging' as a crucial form of generosity in the current era. This involves the willingness to listen respectfully to those from different tribes, understand their perspectives, and find common ground. He shares the story of Darrell Davis, an African-American who befriended a KKK leader, as an example of this difficult but vital work. Anderson believes that most people are not at the extreme political ends and are seeking common ground, but fear of backlash prevents them from bridging divides. Fostering this bridging generosity is essential for addressing major societal challenges.

Mentioned in This Episode

●Software & Apps

●Companies

●Organizations

●Books

●Concepts

●People Referenced

Common Questions

Chris Anderson's new book, 'Infectious Generosity', explores how to foster and leverage generosity in the modern age, particularly through the internet, to create positive change and combat rising cynicism.

Topics

Mindset & Self-Improvement Technology & Innovation Society & Philosophy Business Models Internet Culture Social Critique

Mentioned in this video

People

Sam Harris

Host of the Making Sense podcast, author, and philosopher, who is interviewing Chris Anderson.

Coleman Hughes

A commentator whose talk on colorblindness at TED sparked controversy and is used as a case study for discussions on DEI and free speech.

Sam Bankman-Fried

Founder of FTX, whose scandal is discussed in relation to the cynicism surrounding effective altruism.

Martin Luther King Jr.

His dream of a colorblind society is referenced as a parallel to Coleman Hughes's talk.

Richard Dawkins

Author of 'The Selfish Gene', whose work is referenced in the discussion about evolutionary biology and the origins of altruism.

Elizabeth Dunn

A researcher at the University of British Columbia who partnered on an experiment showing people spent a significant portion of unexpected windfalls generously.

Toby Ord

Co-founder of the Effective Altruism movement, mentioned as someone whose work Sam Harris admires.

Chris Anderson

Curator of the TED conference since 2001 and author of the book "Infectious Generosity".

Peter Singer

Philosopher known for his work on ethics and effective altruism, mentioned as someone whose arguments are relevant to the discussion.

Donald Trump

Former US President, cited as an example of someone who embodies unapologetic selfishness and is idolized by a segment of the public.

Melody Hobson

Her TED Talk arguing for 'color bold' over 'colorblind' policies is mentioned in the discussion about Coleman Hughes's talk.

Daryl Davis

An African-American musician who befriended and helped KKK members leave the organization, featured in Chris Anderson's book as an example of bridging generosity.

Will MacAskill

A co-founder of the Effective Altruism movement, admired by Sam Harris for his contribution to thinking about effective giving.

Paul Bloom

Author of 'Against Empathy', whose ideas on the limitations of empathy in guiding ethical decisions are referenced.

Organizations

TED

A non-profit organization that hosts conferences presenting short talks on 'ideas worth spreading'.

Books

Infectious Generosity

Chris Anderson's new book exploring how to do more good by leveraging new norms around generosity, especially in the internet age.

The Selfish Gene

A book by Richard Dawkins that explores evolutionary biology and altruism, referenced in the discussion about the scientific basis of generosity.

Concepts

Effective Altruism

A philosophy and social movement that uses evidence and reason to determine the most effective ways to benefit others, discussed in the context of cynicism and its founder Sam Bankman-Fried.

Media

Making Sense Podcast

Sam Harris's podcast, which uses a reader-supported, ad-free model with a paywall and scholarship program.

Companies

GoFundMe

A crowdfunding platform mentioned as an example of a personalized giving cause that might not survive a strict effective altruism analysis but can be personally rewarding.