Key Moments

E119: Silicon Valley Bank implodes: startup extinction event, contagion risk, culpability, and more

All-In PodcastAll-In Podcast
People & Blogs4 min read90 min video
Mar 11, 2023|450,864 views|10,364|1,805
Save to Pod
TL;DR

SVB collapse triggers potential startup extinction event and regional banking crisis.

Key Insights

1

Silicon Valley Bank's collapse was triggered by a "run on the bank" fueled by a rapid decline in deposits and a devaluation of its bond portfolio due to rising interest rates.

2

The crisis poses an "extinction level event" for thousands of small tech companies, potentially making them unable to meet payroll.

3

A contagion risk exists for the broader regional banking system as depositors lose confidence and move funds to larger, perceived safer institutions.

4

Culpability is debated, with potential blame on venture capitalists and founders for continued spending, SVB's poor risk management and duration mismatch, and regulators for oversight failures.

5

The VC industry faces a "chilling effect" with potential deal-making freezes, more shutdowns, and a renewed focus on risk management.

6

Government intervention, potentially via guaranteed deposits or buying distressed assets, is seen as necessary to prevent systemic collapse, though with careful structuring to benefit taxpayers.

THE SUDDEN COLLAPSE OF SILICON VALLEY BANK

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) experienced a sudden and dramatic collapse, leading to its takeover by the FDIC. This event triggered a "run on the bank" as depositors, primarily startups and venture capital firms, rushed to withdraw their funds. The crisis paralyzed billions of dollars in deposits, creating immediate existential threats for thousands of companies unable to access their capital for essential operations like payroll. This situation is described as a "Black Swan" event, comparable in its immediate impact on the Silicon Valley ecosystem to the 2008 financial crisis and the onset of COVID-19.

AN EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT FOR STARTUPS

The immediate fallout from SVB's collapse is an "extinction level event" for a significant portion of the startup ecosystem. Thousands of small to medium-sized companies, not the tech giants, have their operating capital frozen at SVB. This means they may be unable to make payroll in the coming weeks. This crisis is seen as potentially more damaging to the core of the U.S. innovation economy—the future companies that will drive competitiveness—than past crises, as it directly threatens their ability to survive and operate.

CAUSES OF THE SVB COLLAPSE: A PERFECT STORM

Several factors converged to cause SVB's downfall. Over the past two years, SVB saw a massive influx of deposits from venture-backed startups. To generate yield, the bank invested heavily in long-duration U.S. Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities. As interest rates rapidly increased, the market value of these bonds plummeted, creating significant unrealized losses. Simultaneously, venture capital funding slowed, and startups continued to burn cash, leading to deposit outflows. When SVB announced plans to sell a portfolio of these devalued assets and raise capital, it ignited panic among depositors, leading to a classic bank run.

BLAME GAME: VCS, SVB, AND REGULATORS

The culpability for the SVB collapse is spread across several actors. Some venture capitalists and founders are criticized for not adequately managing cash reserves and continuing to spend aggressively as interest rates rose and funding dried up. SVB itself is at fault for a severe duration mismatch—investing short-term deposits into long-term, interest-rate-sensitive assets—and for poor risk management. Furthermore, regulators are questioned for allowing such significant duration mismatches and for not identifying or acting on the brewing crisis sooner, despite warning signs from financial analysis sites and internal bank issues.

CONTAGION RISK AND BROADER ECONOMIC IMPACTS

The SVB failure poses a significant contagion risk not just to the tech sector but to the broader regional banking system. Depositors at SVB, realizing their uninsured funds above $250,000 were at risk, began questioning the safety of their money at other regional banks. This fear could lead to runs on other institutions, potentially consolidating the banking system into a few large players. Beyond banking, the crisis impacts payment processors, payroll companies, and other infrastructure providers that relied on SVB, creating cascading effects throughout the economy, including potential impacts on commercial real estate if rent and mortgage payments falter.

THE FUTURE OF VC AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOUNDERS

This crisis is expected to have a profound chilling effect on the venture capital industry. Deal-making activity is likely to freeze in the short term as VCs focus on managing their existing portfolios and triaging distressed companies. Fundraising for new ventures will become significantly harder. Founders are strongly advised to diversify their banking relationships, maintain multiple bank accounts, and prioritize cash runway and burn rate management. Experiencing a bear market and understanding risk management are highlighted as crucial for both VCs and founders to navigate future downturns.

GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AND TAXPAYER PROTECTION

There is a strong consensus that government intervention is necessary to prevent a wider systemic collapse. Potential solutions discussed include a federal backstop to guarantee 100% of deposits, similar to TARP during the 2008 crisis, or an entity acquiring SVB and the Federal Reserve warehousing the risk. Such interventions should be structured to protect taxpayers, potentially by taking equity stakes or warrants in the rescued companies or SVB itself, ensuring a return on investment for the public. The current FDIC insurance limit of $250,000 is deemed insufficient for business accounts, necessitating a broader solution.

Key Takeaways for Founders and Capital Allocators

Practical takeaways from this episode

Do This

Diversify cash across multiple bank accounts.
Maintain sufficient cash reserves to weather storms (e.g., through mid-2025).
Proactively cut burn rates when economic conditions change.
Focus on capital allocation for existing portfolio companies and critical new investments during triage.
Prioritize risk management and be aware of left-tail risks.

Avoid This

Don't rely on a single bank for all your company's funds.
Don't continue spending at pre-recession rates if funding dries up.
Do not assume venture debt is risk-free, especially if VC funding falters.
Do not let complacency set in regarding risk management in venture investing.
Avoid holding large, uninsured deposits in regional banks during times of uncertainty.

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) Balance Sheet (End of 2022)

Data extracted from this episode

CategoryAmount (USD Billions)
Total Liabilities195
Customer Deposits173
Other Debt22
Total Assets208
Loans74
Hold to Maturity Securities91
Available for Sale Securities (Treasuries, MBS)26
Net Book Value (Assets - Liabilities)13

SVB Venture Debt Portfolio Performance (Warrants)

Data extracted from this episode

YearNet Gains on Warrants (USD Millions)
2021560
2022148

Common Questions

SVB experienced a rapid withdrawal of deposits after announcing a significant loss on securities sales. This 'run on the bank' was exacerbated by its exposure to long-duration bonds that lost value due to rising interest rates and its venture debt portfolio, leading to a liquidity crisis.

Topics

Mentioned in this video

More from All-In Podcast

View all 258 summaries

Found this useful? Build your knowledge library

Get AI-powered summaries of any YouTube video, podcast, or article in seconds. Save them to your personal pods and access them anytime.

Try Summify free